2019
DOI: 10.1111/vop.12694
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optical coherence tomography of the retina, nerve fiber layer, and optic nerve head in dogs with glaucoma

Abstract: This is the author manuscript accepted for publication and has undergone full peer review but has not been through the copyediting, typesetting, pagination and proofreading process, which may lead to differences between this version and the Version of Record. Please cite this article as

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
24
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
24
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This study showed that the RNFL was the thickest in the superior area and the thinnest in the nasal area using the ONH scan. There was a slight difference compared to a previous study in dogs showing that the superior area was the thickest and the inferior area the thinnest 3 . The mean thickness of the RNFL was 52.0 µm in this study, which was about 25.7% of the 202.5 µm of the total retinal thickness.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 91%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…This study showed that the RNFL was the thickest in the superior area and the thinnest in the nasal area using the ONH scan. There was a slight difference compared to a previous study in dogs showing that the superior area was the thickest and the inferior area the thinnest 3 . The mean thickness of the RNFL was 52.0 µm in this study, which was about 25.7% of the 202.5 µm of the total retinal thickness.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 91%
“…However, the small sample size remains a limitation, and further studies are needed to determine whether the differences in the CCT between species are related to factors such as genetic and environmental factors. The SD‐OCT unit used in this study calculated the CCT not as the thickness of a specific point, but as the mean thickness of a specific area 3,25 . If the corneal thickness was thin below a certain standard, the machine did not automatically recognize the thickness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations