2010
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.81.043838
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optical control of Faraday rotation in hot Rb vapor

Abstract: The full-text may be used and/or reproduced, and given to third parties in any format or medium, without prior permission or charge, for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-prot purposes provided that:• a full bibliographic reference is made to the original source • a link is made to the metadata record in DRO • the full-text is not changed in any way The full-text must not be sold in any format or medium without the formal permission of the copyright holders.Please consult the full DRO policy … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, we have two Λ transitions that share the same equally-populated states |1 and |3 , creating a mutually influencing groundstate Zeeman coherence. We note that this is very different from the conventional double-Lambda four wave mixing process [25][26][27][28][29] where the intermediate state has negligible Zeeman coherence [see discussion on Fig. S3].…”
mentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Therefore, we have two Λ transitions that share the same equally-populated states |1 and |3 , creating a mutually influencing groundstate Zeeman coherence. We note that this is very different from the conventional double-Lambda four wave mixing process [25][26][27][28][29] where the intermediate state has negligible Zeeman coherence [see discussion on Fig. S3].…”
mentioning
confidence: 73%
“…NMOR enhancement effects have been observed on both the red and blue sides of both the D 1 and D 2 (and combinations thereof) transitions of 87 Rb and 85 Rb. However, we stress that, because the probe and WM lasers are far detuned (even a very large difference in wavelength in the case of D 1- D 2 setup) and because both laser intensities are orders of magnitude below the saturation intensity, our optical WM method is neither a pump-probe scheme nor an electromagnetically induced transparency (EIT) scheme ( 6 8 , 34 , 35 ). In most cases that we studied, large NMOR enhancements were readily observable even when the WM field intensity was a factor of 5 to 8 lower than the probe field, with a frequency difference of several gigahertz.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a three-state atomic system coupling to a linearly polarized probe field ( Fig. 1A ) ( 3 – 8 ), assuming that the initial population is equally distributed between the Zeeman states, the NMOR effect can be derived using third-order perturbation theory ( 9 ). The nondiagonal interaction Hamiltonian of this single-beam Λ system is given by which, when combined with the diagonal Hamiltonian, leads to a third-order polarization for the different probe components of ( 9 , 10 ) …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many previous papers have been devoted to this EIPR study by using either Λ-type [10,11], or ladder-type [12][13][14][15][16] three-level systems. EIPR studies in the presence of a static magnetic field [17][18][19], or combined effects of EIPR and Faraday rotation, have also been reported. In the case of Λ-type systems, controlling powers can be small due to large nonlinearity, but the response time can become long preventing practical application.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%