2017
DOI: 10.1063/1.5002153
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optical extinction of size-controlled aerosols generated from squid chromatophore pigments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Both Mie traces fit within the error bars of the corrected data, showing that the mixing rule provides a good estimate of the effective RI that was measured by the CRD. Despite correlating to a value on the lower end of our originally reported real RI, our data never exceeded a 20% difference with our retrieved value obtained via optical extinction measurements (figure 4(b)), resulting in a better fit than our uncorrected data compared to calculated Mie values [26].…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 59%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Both Mie traces fit within the error bars of the corrected data, showing that the mixing rule provides a good estimate of the effective RI that was measured by the CRD. Despite correlating to a value on the lower end of our originally reported real RI, our data never exceeded a 20% difference with our retrieved value obtained via optical extinction measurements (figure 4(b)), resulting in a better fit than our uncorrected data compared to calculated Mie values [26].…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 59%
“…In an effort to move away from solution-based experiments, we also manufactured squid pigment aerosols. This process enabled us to directly measure the size-dependent optical extinction of pigment particles suspended in nitrogen gas using a cavity ring-down (CRD) spectrometer, a technique common in atmospheric chemistry [26]. Our data suggested good agreement between extinction data measured at 532 nm and the calculated Mie values; however, we still observed a 5%-30% error between the experimental and calculated methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 65%
See 3 more Smart Citations