2006
DOI: 10.1117/12.673513
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optical figuring specifications for thin shells to be used in adaptive telescope mirrors

Abstract: The present work describes the guidelines to define the optical figuring specifications for optical manufacturing of thin shells in terms of figuring error power spectrum (and related rms vs scale distributon) to be used in adaptive optics correctors with force actuators like Deformable Secondary Mirrors (DSM). In particular the numerical example for a thin shell for a VLT DSM is considered.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
5
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
4
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Regardless their origin, the correction of these mid frequency features requires a smoothing process. The value of surface RMS error achieved after bonnet polishing is close to the figuring specification expected for a glass shell before any error compensation by the actuators (flattening) in the framework of an adaptive/active system [19]. We achieved the 15 nm RMS error by polishing the thin shell glued on the stiffening holder, where it was displaying the surface error map of Fig.3A with initial RMS (PV) error of 106 nm (527 nm).…”
Section: Bonnet Polishing Of the Thin Glass Shellsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…Regardless their origin, the correction of these mid frequency features requires a smoothing process. The value of surface RMS error achieved after bonnet polishing is close to the figuring specification expected for a glass shell before any error compensation by the actuators (flattening) in the framework of an adaptive/active system [19]. We achieved the 15 nm RMS error by polishing the thin shell glued on the stiffening holder, where it was displaying the surface error map of Fig.3A with initial RMS (PV) error of 106 nm (527 nm).…”
Section: Bonnet Polishing Of the Thin Glass Shellsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…After cooling down of the shell-mold system, the slumped glass shell is released from the mold. The results were encouraging but displaying an error still too high compared to the requirements: we achieved a surface Root Mean Square (RMS) error >100 nm versus a requirement <10 nm over 100 mm spatial scale [12]. In the present study, we focus on a simple case, namely, shells made in BOROFLOAT® 33 glass, 130 mm wide and 2 mm thick.…”
Section: Icso 2018 International Conference On Space Opticsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…4, the relation between the position command vector c and the actuator position vector p is given by (12) …”
Section: Actuator Coupling and Fitting Errormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering Eqs. (2) and (12), the relationship between a generic shell deformation z and the command vector c is given by The least-square fitting of a generic wave-front w can be obtained as…”
Section: Actuator Coupling and Fitting Errormentioning
confidence: 99%