2019
DOI: 10.5194/gmd-12-1387-2019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optical flow models as an open benchmark for radar-based precipitation nowcasting (rainymotion v0.1)

Abstract: Abstract. Quantitative precipitation nowcasting (QPN) has become an essential technique in various application contexts, such as early warning or urban sewage control. A common heuristic prediction approach is to track the motion of precipitation features from a sequence of weather radar images and then to displace the precipitation field to the imminent future (minutes to hours) based on that motion, assuming that the intensity of the features remains constant (“Lagrangian persistence”). In that context, “opt… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

7
120
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(127 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
7
120
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The tools available in the noise and the time series modules can be used for stochastic simulation of design storms (e.g., Seed et al, 1999;Paschalis et al, 2013) and weather generators (Peleg et al, 2017), and also to understand and quantify the subpixel variability of radar rainfall (e.g., Gires et al, 2014;Benoit et al, 2018;Peleg et al, 2016). Other applications can include stochastic downscaling or emulation of climate model output (e.g., Raut et al, 2018;.…”
Section: Potential Extensions and Applications Of Pystepsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tools available in the noise and the time series modules can be used for stochastic simulation of design storms (e.g., Seed et al, 1999;Paschalis et al, 2013) and weather generators (Peleg et al, 2017), and also to understand and quantify the subpixel variability of radar rainfall (e.g., Gires et al, 2014;Benoit et al, 2018;Peleg et al, 2016). Other applications can include stochastic downscaling or emulation of climate model output (e.g., Raut et al, 2018;.…”
Section: Potential Extensions and Applications Of Pystepsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rivolta et al [14] used simple feed-forward neural network without any consideration for spatiotemporal aspects which leads to large error in nowcasting results. Optical flow based techniques in nowcasting have limited success results because the tracking of pixels and extrapolation of values during prediction are considered as two separate processes [17,18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More formally, given a reflectivity field at time T 0 , radar-based nowcasting methods aim to extrapolate m future time steps T 1 , T 2 , ..., T m in the sequence, using as input the current and n previous observations T −n , ..., T −1 , T 0 .Traditional nowcasting models are manly based on Lagrangian echo extrapolation [7,8], with recent modification that try to infer precipitation growth and decay [9,10] or integrate with Numerical Weather Predictions to extend the time horizon of the prediction [11,12]. In the last few years, Deep Learning (DL) models based on combination of Recurrent Neural Networks (RNN) and Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) have shown substantial improvement over nowcasting methods based on Lagrangian extrapolations for quantitative precipitation forecasting (QPF) [13]. Shi et al [14] introduced the application of the Convolutional Long Short-Term Memory (Conv-LSTM) network architecture with the specific goal of improving precipitation nowcasting over extrapolation models, where LSTM is modified using a convolution operator in the state-to-state and input-to-state transitions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%