2022
DOI: 10.1101/2022.03.14.22272363
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optical Genome Mapping: Clinical Validation and Diagnostic Utility for Enhanced Cytogenomic Analysis of Hematological Neoplasms

Abstract: Hematological neoplasms are predominantly defined by chromosomal aberrations that include structural variations (SVs) and copy number variations (CNVs). The current standard-of-care (SOC) genetic testing for the detection of SVs and CNVs relies on a combination of traditional cytogenetic techniques that include karyotyping, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and chromosomal microarrays (CMA). These techniques are labor-intensive, time and cost-prohibitive, and often do not reveal the genetic complexity… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This becomes particularly relevant when addressing the lower limit of detection (LOD). In this study the LOD appeared to be around a 5% allele fraction which is consistent with the LOD reported by Sahajpal and colleagues [36] who empirically demonstrated the LOD for several classes of SVs from 25% down to 5% allele fraction [36]. In cases 24 and 25, non-sentinel karyotype abnormalities were present at 10% and 11% respectively.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This becomes particularly relevant when addressing the lower limit of detection (LOD). In this study the LOD appeared to be around a 5% allele fraction which is consistent with the LOD reported by Sahajpal and colleagues [36] who empirically demonstrated the LOD for several classes of SVs from 25% down to 5% allele fraction [36]. In cases 24 and 25, non-sentinel karyotype abnormalities were present at 10% and 11% respectively.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Since OGM is performed without culturing of cells, and given the significantly higher number of molecules analyzed, the true VAF in the extracted bulk DNA used for OGM (pre-culture) in cases 24 and 25 may have actually been below 5%. Discrepancies in variant detection between karyotyping and OGM at the 5% allele fraction boundary have also been reported by other groups [22,36]. Since empirical experiments using OGM detect SVs down to a 5% allele fraction, the karyotype events missed by OGM most likely represents culture bias of allele fractions that initially were below 5% but artificially inflated during the cell culture process.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 52%
“…Standard run quality control parameters [total DNA ( ≥150 kbp), N50 ( ≥150 kbp), map rate (≥150 kbp), effective coverage (>300x), average label density (per 100 kbp)] were evaluated per manufacturer's guidelines. Details regarding limit of detection, reproducibility and precision are described in Supplementary Material [41,42].…”
Section: Data Analysis and Variant Filteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple studies published by one of the senior authors of this study demonstrate that OGM allows for a streamlined workflow and consolidation of multiple SOC methods for the manner 15,44,45 . By reducing the number of cytogenomic/molecular tests to a single platform with an estimated increase in diagnostic yield by 10-15% (over SOC), one may expect overall healthcare savings and faster time to results thereby ending the diagnostic odyssey of these patients and families.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%