2010
DOI: 10.1103/physreva.82.032102
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optical homodyne detection in view of the joint probability distribution

Abstract: Optical homodyne detection is examined in view of the joint probability distribution. The usual view is that the relative phase between independent laser fields is localized by photon-number measurements in interference experiments such as homodyne detection. This is why operationally coherent states for laser fields are used in the description of homodyne detection and optical quantum-state tomography. Here, we elucidate these situations by considering the joint probability distribution and the invariance of … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Although these photocurrent components are, in principle, retrievable by measurement, they require a common phase reference between the optical LO and the electronic local oscillator (eLO) used to extract the desired photocurrent Fourier component [30,39]. However, in a typical experimental situation, the optical LO shows relatively fast phase diffusion [40]. If the laser linewidth is not narrow enough to allow a complete characterization of the state before phase diffusion becomes important, or if it is not phase locked to the electronic oscillator, the measurement operator will vary between individual quantum measurements, introducing mixedness in the photocurrent moments.…”
Section: Phase Mixing Regimementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although these photocurrent components are, in principle, retrievable by measurement, they require a common phase reference between the optical LO and the electronic local oscillator (eLO) used to extract the desired photocurrent Fourier component [30,39]. However, in a typical experimental situation, the optical LO shows relatively fast phase diffusion [40]. If the laser linewidth is not narrow enough to allow a complete characterization of the state before phase diffusion becomes important, or if it is not phase locked to the electronic oscillator, the measurement operator will vary between individual quantum measurements, introducing mixedness in the photocurrent moments.…”
Section: Phase Mixing Regimementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similar effects may also occur in other systems, such as in the interference of Cooper pairs emitted from independent superconductors [10]. Recent works have studied the influence of the fact that the laser field is not in a coherent state in the interpretation of optics experiments [5,6,11], in the realization of quantum information protocols [12][13][14], in the emergence of a photon-number superselection rule [6,15], in the meaning of phase coherence in optical fields [13,16], in optical quantum-state tomography [17] and in quantum metrology [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Contudo, na prática, o oscilador local ótico sofre difusão de fase em tempos relativamente curtos [Kawakubo 2010]. Caso estejamos considerando medidas em uma determinada janela de tempo suficiente para que o efeito da difusão de fase seja considerável, haverá uma variação do operador de medida entre medidas consecutivas.…”
Section: O Efeito Da Mistura De Faseunclassified