2022 International Conference Laser Optics (ICLO) 2022
DOI: 10.1109/iclo54117.2022.9839952
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optical loss and noise modelling in microdisk lasers with InGaAs quantum well-dots

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The thresholds, shown in Figure , scale with the inverse of R o . This trend has also been observed in III–V microdisk lasers and attributed to carrier recombination at the etched interface or to optical scattering and surface absorption . The relative weight of surface recombination in the overall carrier lifetime scales as the ratio of the circumference to the surface and thus as 1/ R .…”
Section: Measurement Resultsmentioning
confidence: 61%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The thresholds, shown in Figure , scale with the inverse of R o . This trend has also been observed in III–V microdisk lasers and attributed to carrier recombination at the etched interface or to optical scattering and surface absorption . The relative weight of surface recombination in the overall carrier lifetime scales as the ratio of the circumference to the surface and thus as 1/ R .…”
Section: Measurement Resultsmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Consequently, the observed trend is attributed to surface induced optical absorption or scattering losses, which also scale with 1/ R in microdisks as a consequence of the mode profile becoming larger with increasing disk radius (insets in Figure ) and the overlap with the outer surface thus reducing . The absorption losses can be indirectly caused by surface recombination depleting free carriers at the outer periphery . While the widening mode profile also increases the overlap with the top electrode, corresponding losses remain negligible with the 1.5 μm w 1 (0.07 cm –1 for R o = 9 μm).…”
Section: Measurement Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 3 more Smart Citations