2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcf.2021.03.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optical Measurements of Sweat for in Vivo Quantification of CFTR Function in Individual Sweat Glands

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…8,9 Sweat bubble imaging techniques are technically difficult to operate but are more sensitive than evaporimetry at detecting small but physiologically important differences that distinguish CF from CFTR-RD or measuring the effects of CFTRmodulating drugs on CFTR activity. 8,10,13,20 In our study observed in our cohort. [22][23][24][25] One adult male in this study with repeatedly high SCT values (90 mmol/L) was newly diagnosed with HIV-infection and had an ichthyosis-like skin disorder.…”
Section: Effect Of Age and Sex On Bast In Cftr Negative/healthy Adult...supporting
confidence: 52%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…8,9 Sweat bubble imaging techniques are technically difficult to operate but are more sensitive than evaporimetry at detecting small but physiologically important differences that distinguish CF from CFTR-RD or measuring the effects of CFTRmodulating drugs on CFTR activity. 8,10,13,20 In our study observed in our cohort. [22][23][24][25] One adult male in this study with repeatedly high SCT values (90 mmol/L) was newly diagnosed with HIV-infection and had an ichthyosis-like skin disorder.…”
Section: Effect Of Age and Sex On Bast In Cftr Negative/healthy Adult...supporting
confidence: 52%
“…Other studies with adult subjects employing bubble imaging‐based ratiometric sweat rate assays after β‐adrenergic stimulation report similar accuracy in distinguishing CF, CFTR heterozygotes and healthy controls with β‐adrenergic:cholinergic ratio cut‐off values of 0.0055 or less 8,9 . Sweat bubble imaging techniques are technically difficult to operate but are more sensitive than evaporimetry at detecting small but physiologically important differences that distinguish CF from CFTR‐RD or measuring the effects of CFTR‐modulating drugs on CFTR activity 8,10,13,20 . In our study the clinical objective was to exclude CF or CFTR‐RD in people presenting with clinically suspected CF for which evaporimetry performed well with optimal cut‐off values in adults of Δβ‐adrenergic 4.5 TEWL and β‐adrenergic:cholinergic ratio 0.05.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Whereas QPIT measures the CFTR-mediated reabsorption of chloride in the sweat duct [12] , the β-adrenergic sweat secretion test (SST) measures CFTR-mediated secretion of chloride in the secretory coil of the sweat gland [13][14][15][16][17] . Sato and Sato discovered in the early 1980s that CFTR-mediated sweat secretion can be stimulated with β-adrenergic agonists if the thermoregulative cholinergic sweat secretion is simultaneously inhibited with atropine [18] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%