2007
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/85/1/012023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optical monitoring of micro fluidic flow conditions, employing surface plasmon resonance sensing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If we further consider that the -30% error due to the double layer charging current could be reflected in the surface concentrations calculated from the total reductive desorption charge, these concentrations are comparable to the result found from the angle shift of SPR and STM image calculations (with the assumption that each molecule of DSU, CEG 6 , and C 2 -NTA occupied 0.3, 0.27, and 0.6 nm 2 , respectively; Fig. S1 in Supporting Information), as summarized in Table 1.…”
Section: Characterization Of the Sensor Surfacessupporting
confidence: 63%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…If we further consider that the -30% error due to the double layer charging current could be reflected in the surface concentrations calculated from the total reductive desorption charge, these concentrations are comparable to the result found from the angle shift of SPR and STM image calculations (with the assumption that each molecule of DSU, CEG 6 , and C 2 -NTA occupied 0.3, 0.27, and 0.6 nm 2 , respectively; Fig. S1 in Supporting Information), as summarized in Table 1.…”
Section: Characterization Of the Sensor Surfacessupporting
confidence: 63%
“…The surface concentrations of the DSU, CEG 6 , and C 2 -NTA (were calculated using equation mentioned in Supporting Information, and were already corrected by the roughness factor of 1.50) thiols were 6.6 × 10 -10 , 8.5 × 10 -10 and 4.6 × 10 -10 mol cm -2 , respectively. If we further consider that the -30% error due to the double layer charging current could be reflected in the surface concentrations calculated from the total reductive desorption charge, these concentrations are comparable to the result found from the angle shift of SPR and STM image calculations (with the assumption that each molecule of DSU, CEG 6 , and C 2 -NTA occupied 0.3, 0.27, and 0.6 nm 2 , respectively; Fig.…”
Section: Characterization Of the Sensor Surfacesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations