2002
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20020957
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optical monitoring of the gravitationally lensed quasar Q2237+0305 from APO between June 1995 and January 1998

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite extensive optical monitoring programmes carried out at the Nordic Optical Telescope (Østensen et al 1996) within the OGLE programme (Woźniak et al 2000), by the GLITP collaboration (Alcalde et al 2002) at the Apache Point Observatory (Schmidt et al 2002), and at Maidanak Observatory (Bliokh et al 1999;Dudinov et al 2000;Vakukik et al 2004), there was no significant intrinsic variability detected in QSO2237+0305. The macrolens models of the system predict the time delays of about one day for all components, so the intrinsic variations in the source should manifest themselves almost at the same time in all four images.…”
Section: Application To the Gravitational Lens System Qso2237+0305mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite extensive optical monitoring programmes carried out at the Nordic Optical Telescope (Østensen et al 1996) within the OGLE programme (Woźniak et al 2000), by the GLITP collaboration (Alcalde et al 2002) at the Apache Point Observatory (Schmidt et al 2002), and at Maidanak Observatory (Bliokh et al 1999;Dudinov et al 2000;Vakukik et al 2004), there was no significant intrinsic variability detected in QSO2237+0305. The macrolens models of the system predict the time delays of about one day for all components, so the intrinsic variations in the source should manifest themselves almost at the same time in all four images.…”
Section: Application To the Gravitational Lens System Qso2237+0305mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microlensing can cause an image to be below or above its average magnification for decades (see Witt & Mao 1994, for an extensive discussion of the effects of microlensing). The recent years have seen monitoring campaigns of both Q 2237+030 and Q 0957+561, which provide irrefutable evidence for microlensing (Colley & Schild 2000;Wozniak et al 2000;Schmidt et al 2002). There are at least a further five multiply imaged quasars for which evidence exists implicating microlensing in the optical range (HE 1104-1805, PG 1115+080, H 1413+117, B 0218+357, B 1600+434).…”
Section: Uncertaintiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2002, the results of monitoring Q2237+0305 by the GLITP (Gravitational Lenses International Time Project) collaboration appeared, which cover the 4-month period October 1999-February 2000 (Alcalde et al 2002). The most recent publication of the results of low-resolution observations with the 3.5-m telescope at the Apache Point Observatory should also be mentioned here, (Schmidt et al 2002); these gave the Gunn r lightcurves of the A and B components for 73 dates between July 1995 and January 1998. In spite of a rather low photometric accuracy, -an error bar of 0.1 m to 0.2 m is reported -the data are of value first of all because they include the brightness peak of the A component in 1996.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%