2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-15-6116-0_17
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optical Optimization of Thin-Film Polymer Solar Cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 73 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[92,93] Reflection and interference (both constructive and destructive) by the metal electrodes (more so for vacuum deposited than printed electrodes) as well as by electron/holetransport layers, mostly affect thinner films while they show no significant influence on the thicker ones (>300 nm), which usually exhibit saturation in absorption and consequently in short-circuit current (J sc ). The strong J sc dependence on the optical effects, derived from the active-layer thickness, limits the choice of materials, the range of employable thicknesses, as well as the usable printing techniques for electrodes and interfaces required to fully solution process OPV devices; [93,94] ii) Thickness coating window: Tight precision is required when coating/printing OPV active layer materials that must be thin (≈100 nm), due to low charge mobilities), as a small delta can greatly influence performance through the fill factor (FF) dependence on thickness. The higher charge mobilities exhibited by OPV active-layer materials that can be coated thicker-with the fill factor being not significantly affected by thickness change-allows for a broader process window in terms of precision during coating/printing; iii) Shunt resistance: Thick films allow for better shunt resistance, especially in large-area devices.…”
Section: Thickness Requirements For Printabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[92,93] Reflection and interference (both constructive and destructive) by the metal electrodes (more so for vacuum deposited than printed electrodes) as well as by electron/holetransport layers, mostly affect thinner films while they show no significant influence on the thicker ones (>300 nm), which usually exhibit saturation in absorption and consequently in short-circuit current (J sc ). The strong J sc dependence on the optical effects, derived from the active-layer thickness, limits the choice of materials, the range of employable thicknesses, as well as the usable printing techniques for electrodes and interfaces required to fully solution process OPV devices; [93,94] ii) Thickness coating window: Tight precision is required when coating/printing OPV active layer materials that must be thin (≈100 nm), due to low charge mobilities), as a small delta can greatly influence performance through the fill factor (FF) dependence on thickness. The higher charge mobilities exhibited by OPV active-layer materials that can be coated thicker-with the fill factor being not significantly affected by thickness change-allows for a broader process window in terms of precision during coating/printing; iii) Shunt resistance: Thick films allow for better shunt resistance, especially in large-area devices.…”
Section: Thickness Requirements For Printabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%