2001
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-45400-4_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optical Packet Switching for IP-over-WDM Transport Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be seen that the traffic performance of this node is iuftuenced by the maximum optical packet length Lmax, as iu the case of the node without recirculation ports (see [1]), regardless of packet length distribution. In fact, for the same value of Drnax, unifonnly distributed packets show a lower loss probability, as they have a maximum length of 191', being 381' the maximum packet length of the empirical distribution.…”
Section: ""mentioning
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It can be seen that the traffic performance of this node is iuftuenced by the maximum optical packet length Lmax, as iu the case of the node without recirculation ports (see [1]), regardless of packet length distribution. In fact, for the same value of Drnax, unifonnly distributed packets show a lower loss probability, as they have a maximum length of 191', being 381' the maximum packet length of the empirical distribution.…”
Section: ""mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…{ Po= P(L = 40 bytes}= 0.6 Pl = P(L = 576 bytes) = 0.25 P2 = P(L = 1500 bytes)= 0.15 (1) In this model, packets have average length equal to 393 bytes. Since a 40-bytes long packet is transmitted in one time slot of duration T, the average duration of an optical packet is approximatively lOT.…”
Section: And 5)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation