2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrs.2013.05.051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optical performance of hydrophobic acrylic intraocular lenses with surface light scattering

Abstract: Surface light scattering of explanted IOLs did not affect image resolution or MTF values. Although light transmission was slightly decreased, the magnitude appeared to be inconsequential for optical performance.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
5
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Morphologically they correspond to microvacuoles within the hydrophobic IOL material. Although glistenings seem to reduce contrast sensitivity, a reduction of visual acuity is rare [ 23 26 ]. Aside from calcifications, other alterations of the IOL material have been described, such as IOL schisis, which is caused by the formation of a gap within the IOL material and may also reduce contrast sensitivity [ 27 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Morphologically they correspond to microvacuoles within the hydrophobic IOL material. Although glistenings seem to reduce contrast sensitivity, a reduction of visual acuity is rare [ 23 26 ]. Aside from calcifications, other alterations of the IOL material have been described, such as IOL schisis, which is caused by the formation of a gap within the IOL material and may also reduce contrast sensitivity [ 27 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…27 Staining with Coomassie blue G-250 can confirm protein removal, and, if required, proteins may be eliminated with treatment with a mixture of enzymes (subtilisin A and trypsin), a chelator (ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid), and with a solution of 0.6% sodium hypochlorite in phosphate-buffered saline; in this case, the residual stain should be removed by treating the IOL with a 0.6% sodium hypochlorite solution and then rinsing in distilled deionized water. [55][56][57] As glistening and SSNGS are temper- Gross photograph of the explanted lens in the dry state (320). (B) Light photomicrograph of the dry lens (3400).…”
Section: Methods For Iol Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The coexistence of these two factors, i.e., the high level of glistening and protein adsorption, slightly affected the light transmittance of the examined IOLs, which as a result of extreme incubation test conditions, decreased only by about 10.0%. However, this should not negatively impact the overall quality of vision because the decrease was consistent throughout the visible range [32,33]. The presence of the albumin layer on the surface of hydrophobic IOLs reduced visible light transmission compared to non-degraded IOLs, mainly for Tecnis® and Acry-Sof® IQ SN60WF (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%