2014
DOI: 10.1364/josaa.31.000745
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optical reflectivity of a disordered monolayer of highly scattering particles: coherent scattering model versus experiment

Abstract: Recently a multiple-scattering model for the reflectivity of a disordered monolayer of scattering particles on a flat surface was put forth [J. Opt. Soc. Am.29, 1161 (2012)]. The approximate theoretical model provides relatively simple formulas for the reflectivity, but it was developed for a monodisperse monolayer. Here we extend the model to the case of a polydisperse monolayer and derive the appropriate formulas to calculate the optical transmissivity of the monolayer supported by a flat interface. A second… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(59 reference statements)
0
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The DM is well-suited to study metasurfaces with particles much smaller than the incident wavelength since it considers only the electric dipole moment induced within each particle. The second approach is a more sophisticated analytical model developed a few years ago, called the coherent scattering model (CSM), which represents an approximate solution to Maxwell’s equations that takes into account multiple-scattering effects. It aims to study the optical response of a two-dimensional random array of spherical particles forming a monolayer.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The DM is well-suited to study metasurfaces with particles much smaller than the incident wavelength since it considers only the electric dipole moment induced within each particle. The second approach is a more sophisticated analytical model developed a few years ago, called the coherent scattering model (CSM), which represents an approximate solution to Maxwell’s equations that takes into account multiple-scattering effects. It aims to study the optical response of a two-dimensional random array of spherical particles forming a monolayer.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that we intentionally defined the three EOAs in terms of the linear operators Î and scâ ℑ acting on an optical observable rather than on the macroscopic field vectors (of course these definitions can be generalized to include types of optical observables other than the Poynting-Stokes tensor). Traditionally, however, EMAs have been introduced with the purpose of replicating the average macroscopic field vectors rather than specific optical observables [72][73][74][75][76][77][78][192][193][194][195][196][197][198][199]. In other words, a semi-stochastic EOA would normally be introduced as a recipe for replacing a stochastic morphologically complex scattering object by a fixed simple "effective" object such that in Eq.…”
Section: Effective-object Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Direct computer solutions of the MMEs for morphologically complex objects can be quite time-consuming and in many cases impracticable. As a consequence, there has been a widespread use of phenomenological so-called effective-medium rules intended to drastically simplify the computation (see [72][73][74][75][76][77][78][192][193][194][195][196][197][198][199] and references therein). Implicitly, the main idea of an effective-object approximation (EOA) (more commonly known as an effective-medium approximation, or EMA) is to replace a morphologically complex object, either fixed or randomly varying in time, by a much simpler "effective" object possessing essentially the same scattering properties.…”
Section: Effective-object Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in the case of a highly turbid medium there is detectable loss in TIR intensity owing to scattering even for these small penetration depths, which had not been carefully accounted for until our work in Refs. [17,19,20], and recent elegant work by others [26][27][28]. Our model calculates the scattering-induced loss in TIR intensity by introducing the concept of an angle-dependent n i , i.e., n i θ i n i κθ i .…”
Section: B Theoretical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%