2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2018.06.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optical simulation of a central receiver system: Comparison of different software tools

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, by performing the optical analysis of the cavity receiver, Qiu, Y et al [46] recommended the use of a multi-point focus strategy instead of the traditional one-point strategy in order to make more homogenous the solar flux which leads to an increase of the optical efficiency of the system. Moreover, the prediction of the flux density distribution on the heliostat field with high accuracy is essential in the design phase of the heliostat field [47,48] and is commonly used for the optimization of the solar field layout for CSP plants such as in PS10 [49] or DAHAN [50,51]. The most important strategies for optical modeling of CRS are divided in two categories, the flux distribution prediction and the heliostat field optimization, as shown in Figure 6.…”
Section: Concentrator Incidence Angle Modifiermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, by performing the optical analysis of the cavity receiver, Qiu, Y et al [46] recommended the use of a multi-point focus strategy instead of the traditional one-point strategy in order to make more homogenous the solar flux which leads to an increase of the optical efficiency of the system. Moreover, the prediction of the flux density distribution on the heliostat field with high accuracy is essential in the design phase of the heliostat field [47,48] and is commonly used for the optimization of the solar field layout for CSP plants such as in PS10 [49] or DAHAN [50,51]. The most important strategies for optical modeling of CRS are divided in two categories, the flux distribution prediction and the heliostat field optimization, as shown in Figure 6.…”
Section: Concentrator Incidence Angle Modifiermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the tracking system largely contributes to 20% of the CSP plants' operational and maintenance cost [22]. It has been established that CSP plants that have optimal tracking systems are more efficient [34]. For this reason, the remaining sections of this paper will review published literature on CSP tracking systems to highlight their strengths and weaknesses.…”
Section: State Of the Art Of Csp Research And Development In Africamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are two main types of CSP tracking systems depending on their freedoms/degrees of movement. First are the single-axis solar tracking systems [34,35], which track the Sun from one side to another using a single pivot point to rotate. This type of tracking system is suitable for line focusing systems.…”
Section: Review Of Tracking Systems For Crsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prospects of gas-and liquid-based receiver systems that can achieve this high range of operating temperatures has also been reviewed. The authors of [6] carried out a comparative analysis between the different software tools used for heliostat field design and analysis. The paper concluded that SolTrace, Tonatiuh, CRS4-2, and MATLAB code yielded similar results.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%