2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.optcom.2014.09.061
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optical studies of an exciton and a biexciton in a CdTe/ZnTe quantum dot nanostructure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The behavior of the binding energies without pressure (P ¼ 0 kbar) is similar to the previous results found in refs. [38,39,49,50]. For all pressures, we observe that the binding energy increases from its bulk value in GaAs as the dot radius is reduced, reaches a maximum value, and then drops to the bulk value characteristic of the barrier material as the dot radius goes to zero.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…The behavior of the binding energies without pressure (P ¼ 0 kbar) is similar to the previous results found in refs. [38,39,49,50]. For all pressures, we observe that the binding energy increases from its bulk value in GaAs as the dot radius is reduced, reaches a maximum value, and then drops to the bulk value characteristic of the barrier material as the dot radius goes to zero.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…6). In the case of CdSe or CdTe based QDs the ∆E X−XX exhibits typically a low scatter and remains in a relatively narrow range of 20-25 meV [38][39][40]43,[45][46][47][48] or 12-15 meV [44][45][46]49,50 , respectively. Hence, the ∆E X−XX in our case spans from values typical for the CdSe/ZnSe QDs, through values typical for the CdTe/ZnTe QDs, down to much lower values, which were not observed before for the CdSe or the CdTe based QDs systems and which would not be expected for the Cd(Se,Te)/ZnSe QDs if they were homogeneous in a volume.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that the QD1 exhibits much lower intensity as compared to the QD2, as expected for a QD with a decreased exciton oscillator strength resulting from a decreased e-h overlap. 42,44 The spectra of the XX and X transitions from the QD1 and the QD2 plotted as a function of a detected linear polarization angle reveal two linearly polarized orthogonal components (see panels c-f) in the Fig. 5).…”
Section: B Impact Of E-h Wavefunctions Overlap On Landé Factor and An...mentioning
confidence: 96%