2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2013.04.043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optical tomography reconstruction algorithm with the finite element method: An optimal approach with regularization tools

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As the inverse problem is ill-posed, regularization procedure is compulsory. Different regularization tools were investigated in this work: parameterization of the control space, Tikhonov penalization and Sobolev gradients, [7]. The paper will be the first to present the resolution of the inverse problem.…”
Section: Retrieval Of the Radiative Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the inverse problem is ill-posed, regularization procedure is compulsory. Different regularization tools were investigated in this work: parameterization of the control space, Tikhonov penalization and Sobolev gradients, [7]. The paper will be the first to present the resolution of the inverse problem.…”
Section: Retrieval Of the Radiative Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this context, near-infrared light is used in order to take advantage of the so-called therapeutic window (600-900 nm) in which tissues have low absorption. According to the application, RTE has to be considered as forward model [14][15][16][17][18][19], diffuse approximation (DA) may be applied [8,12,[20][21][22][23], or hybrid model is employed [24][25][26][27][28]. This paper deals with two very different forward models, namely, the bidimensional steady-state RTE and the threedimensional frequency DA, in order to gauge the potential ability of the introduced regularization with the different models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The methods employed to solve this problem include the non-linear conjugate-gradient method [3], Gauss-Newton based methods [4][5][6][7], the L-BFGS method [8][9][10][11][12], shape-based reconstruction method [13,14] or, in a Bayesian framework, the approximation error method [15,16]. Regarding the first three listed methods, some problems remain to be overcome such as the stability with respect to the initial guesses and the blurring effect of the reconstructed images due to the need for relatively strong regularization tools [17,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparisons with other methods found in the literature such as the Gauss-Newton method is out of the scope of the paper. However, let us point-out that the L-BFGS method has proven its worth in the field of the optical tomography as shown by the following papers [8][9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%