2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.spmi.2004.11.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optical transitions in geometrical quantum islands

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to these studies, the hydrogenic donor binding energy has been surveyed as theoretically by many authors for QDs which have different geometries such as spherical, cylindrical, pyramidal and rectangular. [14][15][16][17][18][19][20] Riberio and Latge 21 worked on a cubic quantum heterostructures and they have showed that the binding energy values are close to those of cubic and spherical QDs which have near volume. Bose and Sarkar 22 have used perturbation and variation technique to obtain hydrogenic donor binding energies in a spherical QD for an infinite parabolic confinement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to these studies, the hydrogenic donor binding energy has been surveyed as theoretically by many authors for QDs which have different geometries such as spherical, cylindrical, pyramidal and rectangular. [14][15][16][17][18][19][20] Riberio and Latge 21 worked on a cubic quantum heterostructures and they have showed that the binding energy values are close to those of cubic and spherical QDs which have near volume. Bose and Sarkar 22 have used perturbation and variation technique to obtain hydrogenic donor binding energies in a spherical QD for an infinite parabolic confinement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although in earlier theoretical works the confining potential was mainly considered as parabolic, which was appropriate for the QDs with many electrons and simplified the calculations, later much attention was paid to the confining potential determined by the QD shape. As examples, the spherical QDs ͑SQDs͒, 4-8 semispherical QDs ͑SSQDs͒, 4,9 ellipsoidal QDs ͑EQDs͒, 8,10,11 lens QDs ͑LQDs͒, 8,12,13 conical QDs, 14 and 8 piramidal QDs were considered in recent literature. It is interesting that QDs of even the same shape were treated by means of different approaches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Later much attention was paid to the confining potential determined by the QD shape. For example, the spherical QDs (SQDs), 2-6 semispherical QDs (SSQDs), 3,7 ellipsoidal QDs (EQDs), 6,8,9 lens QDs (LQDs), 6,10,11 conical QDs, 12 and piramidal QDs 6 were considered in recent literature. To simplify calculations the symmetric shapes of QDs are frequently used, though even in such cases the three-dimensionality of QDs creates serious difficulty for calculations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%