1992
DOI: 10.1086/116194
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optical variability of the Seyfert nucleus NGC 7469 in timescales from days to minutes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4 in the paper by Merkulova 2000). The result of this guiding test is very near to the calculations that have been made by Dultzin-Hacyan et al (1992): the measured brightness has an appreciable error (more than 1%) at a distance more than 5 from the center of a 20 diaphragm.…”
Section: Observations and Reductionssupporting
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4 in the paper by Merkulova 2000). The result of this guiding test is very near to the calculations that have been made by Dultzin-Hacyan et al (1992): the measured brightness has an appreciable error (more than 1%) at a distance more than 5 from the center of a 20 diaphragm.…”
Section: Observations and Reductionssupporting
confidence: 70%
“…The shortest time scale of variations in the optical was reported by Dultzin-Hacyan et al (1992) for the NGC 7469 galaxy nucleus. Using a Stromgren photometer, they investigated variations with a duration of ∼13 min and average amplitude ∼0.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Variability of a few tenths of a magnitude are common on timescales from days to months. Optical broad-band variations with even shorter time-scales have been claimed by Dultzin-Hacyan et al (1992) and Lyutyi et al (1995). Westin (1984) analysed an extensive series of UV observations taken with the International Ultraviolet Explorer (IUE) from 1978 June to 1982 December, showing variations of a factor of two in the 1500-Å continuum and somewhat less in the Fine Error Sensor (ϳvisible) counts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…However, different authors often use different variability criteria. Computing quantities such as the ‘amplitude of the variations’ A m = (Δ m 2 −σ 2 m ) 1/2 (Dultzin‐Hacyan et al 1992), the variability coefficient C eff =Δ m /σ m (Jang & Miller 1997; S03) or P (χ 2 ) (de Diego et al 1998; Webb & Malkan 2000) constitute different approaches that may lead to different conclusions on the presence of the variability, even applied to the same data. This is true especially when the variations are very small or negligible.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Earlier microvariability observations were performed on relatively small-aperture telescopes, equipped with single-channel photomultipliers. They supposedly revealed short-term variability of E-mail: bachevr@astro.bas.bg (RB); anton@astro.bas.bg (AS) about 0.1 mag in nearby Seyferts, monitored mainly in U and B bands (Lyutyi et al 1989;Dultzin-Hacyan et al 1992;Merkulova 2000). Unfortunately, with such equipment an adequate assessment of the photometric errors is hardly possible and, taking into account the photon noise, atmospheric instabilities, etc., the photometric errors may easily reach a value comparable to the variability amplitude claimed (see also Section 4).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%