2004
DOI: 10.1007/bf02702287
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optical variability properties of high luminosity AGN classes

Abstract: 1We present the results of a comparative study of the intra-night optical variability (INOV) characteristics of radio-loud and radio-quiet quasars, which involves a systematic intra-night optical monitoring of seven sets of high luminosity AGNs covering the redshift range z 0.2 to z 2.2. The sample, matched in the optical luminosity -redshift (M B -z) plane, consists of seven radio-quiet quasars (RQQs), eight radio lobe-dominated quasars (LDQs), six radio core-dominated quasars (CDQs) and five BL Lac objects (… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
102
3

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(115 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
10
102
3
Order By: Relevance
“…With a significantly enlarged sample of 30 DLCs of RQWLQs in the present study, we now find that their INOV duty cycle is about 5 per cent, at a typical INOV detection threshold of around 5 per cent and a monitoring duration of about 3−5 hours. In our programme, two of the RQWLQs were found in two sessions to exhibit very strong INOV (amplitude ψ > 10%), a level never observed in our 2-decade long INOV programme (summarized in GGWSS13, Goyal et al 2012;Stalin et al 2004b), except for BL Lacs and HPCDQs. The two RQWLQs, namely J090843.25+285229.8 (ψ ∼ 31% on 10.02.2013, Table 4) and J140710.26+241853.6 ( ψ ∼ 36% on 03.05.2014, Figure 1, Table 4), are thus currently the best available candidates for the elusive population of radio-quiet BL Lacs and hence need to be followed up.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 44%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…With a significantly enlarged sample of 30 DLCs of RQWLQs in the present study, we now find that their INOV duty cycle is about 5 per cent, at a typical INOV detection threshold of around 5 per cent and a monitoring duration of about 3−5 hours. In our programme, two of the RQWLQs were found in two sessions to exhibit very strong INOV (amplitude ψ > 10%), a level never observed in our 2-decade long INOV programme (summarized in GGWSS13, Goyal et al 2012;Stalin et al 2004b), except for BL Lacs and HPCDQs. The two RQWLQs, namely J090843.25+285229.8 (ψ ∼ 31% on 10.02.2013, Table 4) and J140710.26+241853.6 ( ψ ∼ 36% on 03.05.2014, Figure 1, Table 4), are thus currently the best available candidates for the elusive population of radio-quiet BL Lacs and hence need to be followed up.…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 44%
“…A point worth emphasizing here is that while applying the F η −test, it is specially important to use the correct rms errors on the photometric data points. It has been found that the magnitude errors returned by the routines in the data reduction softwares of DAOPHOT and IRAF, are normally underestimated by a factor η ranging between 1.3 and 1.75, as shown in various studies (e.g., Gopal-Krishna et al 1995;Garcia et al 1999;Sagar et al 2004;Stalin et al 2004b;Bachev et al 2005). Recently Goyal et al (2012) estimated the best-fit value of η to be 1.5.…”
Section: Statistical Analysis Of Dlcsmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The enhanced F-test values are presented in Table 1. The duty cycle (in per cent) (DC) of BL Lacertae is computed following the definition of Romero et al (1999) that later was used by many authors (e.g., Stalin et al 2004;Goyal et al 2012, and references therein),…”
Section: Flux Variationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Not only are some of these simultaneously monitored stars used for measuring any variations in the seeing disk during the course of the monitoring session, but, more importantly, they are used as non-varying standards relative to which the light curve of the target AGN can be drawn. Such 'differential light curves' (DLCs) are also drawn for the candidate 'comparison stars' themselves and used to check for the presence of INOV of those stars, in which case they are disqualified as comparison stars (e.g., Miller & Wiita 1991;Stalin et al 2004b;Wiita 2006). A key advantage of using DLCs is that the effects of any fluctuations in the atmospheric attenuation and even in the seeing disk are mostly canceled out, and this way the variability detection threshold is pushed down enormously (e.g., Howell & Jacoby 1986;Miller, Carini, & Goodrich 1989;Gilliland et al 1993;Howell et al 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%