2017
DOI: 10.1007/s00411-017-0725-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) dosimetry in irradiated alumina substrates from mobile phone resistors

Abstract: In this study the dosimetric properties of alumina (Al2O3) substrates found in resistors retrieved from mobile phones were investigated. Measurements of the decline of optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) generated following exposure of these substrates to ionising radiation showed that 16% of the signal could still be detected after 2 years (735 days). Further, the magnitude of the regenerative dose (calibration dose; D i) had no impact on the accuracy of dose estimates. Therefore, it is recommended that t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The specific luminescence values Cspecific (counts•mg −1 •Gy −1 ) and LOD are given in Table 2 for all used materials. LOD is calculated according to the method reported by Geber-Bergstrand et al [5,6]. This method considers the uncertainty of the calibration curves of the dose response.…”
Section: Osl Signalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The specific luminescence values Cspecific (counts•mg −1 •Gy −1 ) and LOD are given in Table 2 for all used materials. LOD is calculated according to the method reported by Geber-Bergstrand et al [5,6]. This method considers the uncertainty of the calibration curves of the dose response.…”
Section: Osl Signalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results of Reader 1 for the limits of detection for measurements are 70 mGy for the infrared stimulation and 20 mGy for the blue stimulation, while 100 mGy was obtained with Reader 2. The other method for the calculation of the limit of detection is the one reported by Geber-Bergstrand et al (17). It considers the uncertainty of the calibration curves of the dose response.…”
Section: Dose Responsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Full details of the blood sampling and performance of biological dosimetry methods are as yet unpublished, and will be submitted for future publication; these will focus on the dicentric assay and gene expression assay. 4 In brief, 160 ml blood was taken from one healthy volunteer with informed consent under ethical approval (Dnr 2019-03844 Etikprövingsmyndigheten) into lithium heparin tubes to prevent coagulation for dicentric chromosome assay, and EDTA tubes for gene expression analyses. The tubes were distributed among eight thermos flasks which were filled with water warmed to 378C, to simulate blood in the human body.…”
Section: Bloodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biological and physical retrospective dosimetry include both recognized and emergent methods (1,2) to reconstruct radiation doses after exposure to assist in triage and treatment of exposed individuals, and to increase knowledge about an exposure scenario for epidemiology and research. For physical retrospective dosimetry, fortuitous materials such as mobile phone electronic components (3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8), display glass (9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15), LCD and touch screen glass (11,(16)(17)(18)(19)(20)(21), chip cards (7,(22)(23)(24)(25)(26)(27), ceramics (28)(29)(30), desiccants (31), textiles (32,33), cigarettes (34), household salt (35)(36)(37)(38)(39), and many more have been investigated as possible materials for application in radiological accident dosimetry [see (40,41)]. The 2019 ICRU report, no.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%