2020
DOI: 10.3390/coatings11010022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optics of Inhomogeneous Thin Films with Defects: Application to Optical Characterization

Abstract: This review paper is devoted to optics of inhomogeneous thin films exhibiting defects consisting in transition layers, overlayers, thickness nonuniformity, boundary roughness and uniaxial anisotropy. The theoretical approaches enabling the inclusion of these defects into formulae expressing the optical quantities of these inhomogeneous thin films are summarized. These approaches are based on the recursive and matrix formalisms for the transition layers and overlayers, averaging of the elements of the Mueller m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 107 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…During this separate characterization, the thin NOL layer was considered as an overlayer originating from air exposure, which would not have occurred if the polymer-like thin film had been deposited immediately after cleaning procedure. The reliability of the determined optical constants of the transition layer is supported by the strong agreement with our earlier work [35] , [53] , [54] . The only parameter related to the transition layer determined during the processing of data for samples with films was its thickness.…”
Section: Dispersion Modelsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…During this separate characterization, the thin NOL layer was considered as an overlayer originating from air exposure, which would not have occurred if the polymer-like thin film had been deposited immediately after cleaning procedure. The reliability of the determined optical constants of the transition layer is supported by the strong agreement with our earlier work [35] , [53] , [54] . The only parameter related to the transition layer determined during the processing of data for samples with films was its thickness.…”
Section: Dispersion Modelsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…On the other hand, films deposited at 6.10 -3 mbar (C6 and I6) show minor interference fringes indicating inhomogeneity in the films. As mentioned in work of Ohlídal et al [34], this inhomogeneity is due to surficial and inner roughness of the films. From Figure 3 (a), it can be underlined that there is no absorption edge shift for the C3 film whatever the annealing temperature.…”
Section: Through the Filmsmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…On the other hand, films deposited at 6 × 10 −3 mbar (C6 and I6) show minor interference fringes, indicating inhomogeneity in the films. As mentioned in the work of Ohlídal et al [34], this inhomogeneity is due to the surficial and inner roughness of the films. From Figure 3a, it can be underlined that there is no absorption edge shift for the C3 film whatever the annealing temperature.…”
Section: Through the Filmsmentioning
confidence: 77%