2010
DOI: 10.1890/08-1749.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal allocation of conservation effort among subpopulations of a threatened species: How important is patch quality?

Abstract: Abstract. Money is often a limiting factor in conservation, and attempting to conserve endangered species can be costly. Consequently, a framework for optimizing fiscally constrained conservation decisions for a single species is needed. In this paper we find the optimal budget allocation among isolated subpopulations of a threatened species to minimize local extinction probability. We solve the problem using stochastic dynamic programming, derive a useful and simple alternative guideline for allocating funds,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Until sufficient money is made available, conservationists will continue to be faced with the dilemma of devoting more resources to save a few species versus spreading resources too thinly to achieve success with any species [58]. Similarly, when focusing on a single population, spreading resources too thinly over a large area may reduce the likelihood of saving even a small area [59], [60]. Conservationists even face trade-offs about whether to divert limited resources away from direct conservation activities in order to perform rigorous cost benefit analyses of their effectiveness [1].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Until sufficient money is made available, conservationists will continue to be faced with the dilemma of devoting more resources to save a few species versus spreading resources too thinly to achieve success with any species [58]. Similarly, when focusing on a single population, spreading resources too thinly over a large area may reduce the likelihood of saving even a small area [59], [60]. Conservationists even face trade-offs about whether to divert limited resources away from direct conservation activities in order to perform rigorous cost benefit analyses of their effectiveness [1].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Post-release survival to reproductive age is crucial to the establishment and persistence of reintroduced populations (Armstrong & Seddon, 2008;Parlato & Armstrong, 2013). Post-release survival of individuals frequently varies among multiple release sites depending on factors such as food availability or predation pressure (Chauvenet et al, 2010). In a metapopulation context, establishment can be more difficult at some release sites than others depending on available resources and threats.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Chauvenet et al, 2010;Collazo et al, 2013;Helmstedt & Possingham, 2016;, few have evaluated how variation in release site characteristics can be exploited to reduce post-release effects and increase establishment success in metapopulation restoration efforts. Chauvenet et al, 2010;Collazo et al, 2013;Helmstedt & Possingham, 2016;, few have evaluated how variation in release site characteristics can be exploited to reduce post-release effects and increase establishment success in metapopulation restoration efforts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples include finance, education, construction, transportation, ecology, telecommunication, etc. (see Phillips and Bana e Costa (2007); Paxson and Schady (2002); Karlaftis et al (2007); Chauvenet et al (2010); Lin et al (2009)). Phillips and Bana e Costa (2007) describe five characteristics of the decision dilemma in such problems: (1) benefits are typically expressed by multiple objectives often in conflict; (2) decision makers cannot know every detail about a large number of given alternatives to make informed decisions; (3) individually optimal decisions rarely lead to the collectively best use of the available resources; (4) involved stakeholders cause dispute and competition; (5) those who disagree with the decisions overemphasize their own opinions in implementation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%