2019
DOI: 10.1007/s13324-019-00299-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal and non-optimal lattices for non-completely monotone interaction potentials

Abstract: We investigate the minimization of the energy per point E f among d -dimensional Bravais lattices, depending on the choice of pairwise potential equal to a radially symmetric function f (|x| 2 ) . We formulate criteria for minimality and non-minimality of some lattices for E f at fixed scale based on the sign of the inverse Laplace transform of f when f is a superposition of exponentials, beyond the class of completely monotone functions. We also construct a family of non-completely monotone functions having t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

7
73
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
(129 reference statements)
7
73
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We observe that the Morse potential V M , for r 0 = 1 fixed, converges to −δ(x − 1) as α → +∞ (see Figure 1). A similar proof as the one we have done for the Lennard-Jones type potential in [16,Thm 1.13] shows the global optimality of a lattice achieving the kissing number with balls of radius 1/2, for sufficiently large α. In particular, in dimension 2 (resp.…”
Section: Confirmation Of Our Conjecture In Dimensionsupporting
confidence: 70%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…We observe that the Morse potential V M , for r 0 = 1 fixed, converges to −δ(x − 1) as α → +∞ (see Figure 1). A similar proof as the one we have done for the Lennard-Jones type potential in [16,Thm 1.13] shows the global optimality of a lattice achieving the kissing number with balls of radius 1/2, for sufficiently large α. In particular, in dimension 2 (resp.…”
Section: Confirmation Of Our Conjecture In Dimensionsupporting
confidence: 70%
“…This also holds for the Lennard-Jones potential for large exponents (see e.g. [3,16]). Even though P 3 hcp ∈ L 3 , using formula (1.10) we have computed the numerical values of E α,r 0 [λ hcp].…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 3 more Smart Citations