1986
DOI: 10.1016/0378-3758(86)90106-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal Bayes procedures for selecting the better of two Bernoulli populations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using only 16 processors of an IBM SP2 we solved the 3-arm, n = 200 problem. This is approximately 500,000 times harder than the problem called "impractical" in [9], and 2,000 times harder than that solved in [3] on a Cray 2. Our system is only about 22× a single processor Cray 2, and hence the primary advantage is our serial and parallel optimizations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Using only 16 processors of an IBM SP2 we solved the 3-arm, n = 200 problem. This is approximately 500,000 times harder than the problem called "impractical" in [9], and 2,000 times harder than that solved in [3] on a Cray 2. Our system is only about 22× a single processor Cray 2, and hence the primary advantage is our serial and parallel optimizations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The 3-arm problem had never previously been solved exactly because it was considered infeasible. Indicating frustration with the far easier 2-arm bandit problem, researchers have commented: "In theory the optimal strategies can always be found by dynamic programming but the computation required is prohibitive" [20], and "the space and time requirements for this computation grow at a rate proportional to n 4 making it impractical to compute the decision even for moderate values of say n 50" [9]. Previously, the largest exact 2-arm bandit solution utilized a Cray 2 supercomputer to solve n = 200 [3].…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is approximately 500,000 times harder than the problem called "impractical" in [9], and 2,000 times harder than that solved in [3] on a Cray 2. Our system is only about 22 a single processor Cray 2, and hence the primary advantage is our serial and parallel optimizations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indicating frustration with the far easier 2-arm bandit problem, researchers have commented: "In theory the optimal strategies can always be found by dynamic programming but the computation required is prohibitive" [20], and "the space and time requirements for this computation grow at a rate proportional to n 4 making it impractical to compute the decision even for moderate values of say n 50" [9]. Previously, the largest exact 2-arm bandit solution utilized a Cray 2 supercomputer to solve n=200 [3].…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%