2016 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting (PESGM) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/pesgm.2016.7741167
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal behavior of electric vehicle parking lots as demand response aggregation agents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
41
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
41
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In [27], the participation level of EV parking station in different price-based and incentive-based DR programs was optimized using a stochastic programming to maximize the operator's profit. Similar method was used in [28] to design a DR offering/bidding strategy that allows the parking station to take part in the intraday Demand Response eXchange (DRX) market [29] as an aggregation agent.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In [27], the participation level of EV parking station in different price-based and incentive-based DR programs was optimized using a stochastic programming to maximize the operator's profit. Similar method was used in [28] to design a DR offering/bidding strategy that allows the parking station to take part in the intraday Demand Response eXchange (DRX) market [29] as an aggregation agent.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1) The works in [7][8][9][10], [18] focused on the EV charging coordination, while those in [27], [28], [30] optimized the amount of energy traded in different energy markets. The proposed work explores the role of EV parking station as both DR and charging service providers, aiming to optimize the individual charging schedule of each EV while being able to fulfill the demand curtailment request from utility.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DR can be incentive‐based (LC), price‐based (an effective pricing policy), and demand reduction bids based (demand bidding/buyback programs) to the consumer to connect/disconnect their load depending on the signal. Shafie‐Khah et al compared DR program for a price‐based and incentive‐based with different subprograms such as ToU, real‐time pricing (RTP), critical peak pricing (CPP), and emergency demand response program (EDRP). Controlling method for the load is also proposed, such as Interruptible/Curtailable (I/C services), DLC.…”
Section: Factors To Be Considered For Ems Implementationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the role of the EVs in DR is not discernible. Optimal strategies of parking lots is derived as responsive demands, in both price‐based (RTP DR, TOU DR, Emergency DR, and CPP DR) and incentive‐based DR programs (interruptible/curtailabe DR). The impacts of different DR programs on the operational behavior of parking lots in an electricity market are proposed, which optimizes the participation level of parking lots.…”
Section: Electric Vehicles and Flexible Loads In Drmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Optimal strategies of parking lots is derived as responsive demands, in both price‐based (RTP DR, TOU DR, Emergency DR, and CPP DR) and incentive‐based DR programs (interruptible/curtailabe DR). The impacts of different DR programs on the operational behavior of parking lots in an electricity market are proposed, which optimizes the participation level of parking lots. A distributed multiagent EV management system is presented, which satisfies the energy requirements of a large number of EVs based on Nash certainty equivalence principle.…”
Section: Electric Vehicles and Flexible Loads In Drmentioning
confidence: 99%