2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-13-1822-1_39
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal Bidding Strategy in Deregulated Power Market Using Invasive Weed Optimization

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…After using classical methods for solving bidding problem, the authors in refs. [5][6][7][8][9][10] uses different optimization techniques considering the factors like cost of generations, market constraints and rival's bidding behaviour that affect the bidding strategy problem. The risk issue is chosen as the key issues for bidding problem [11] where the risk is minimized for profit maximization in a competitive electricity market.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After using classical methods for solving bidding problem, the authors in refs. [5][6][7][8][9][10] uses different optimization techniques considering the factors like cost of generations, market constraints and rival's bidding behaviour that affect the bidding strategy problem. The risk issue is chosen as the key issues for bidding problem [11] where the risk is minimized for profit maximization in a competitive electricity market.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Strategic bidding problem for competitive power suppliers in the England -wale electricity markets is provided in [11,12]. These algorithms such as genetic algorithm (GA) [13], particle swarm optimization algorithm (PSO) [14], differential evolution (DE) [15], invasive weed optimization (IWO) [16] and krill herd algorithm (KHA) [17], bacterial foraging algorithm [18], agent-based algorithm [19], bat inspired algorithm [20] have been applied in solving the DSOBS problem. Advantages and limitations of these methods are explained by few researchers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%