2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00440-015-0629-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal bounds for convergence of expected spectral distributions to the semi-circular law

Abstract: Let X = (X jk ) n j,k=1 denote a Hermitian random matrix with entries X jk , which are independent for 1 ≤ j ≤ k ≤ n. We consider the rate of convergence of the empirical spectral distribution function of the matrix X to the semi-circular law assuming that EX jk = 0, EX 2 jk = 1 and that sup By means of a recursion argument it is shown that the Kolmogorov distance between the expected spectral distribution of the Wigner matrix W = 1 √ n X and the semicircular law is of order O(n −1 ).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
46
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The result (1.3) under the conditions (C0) was proved in a series of papers [11], [9], [31] with an n-dependent value β = c log log n. In [18] we gave a self-contained proof based on the methods developed in [28], [23] while at the same time reducing the power of log n from β = c log log n to β = 2. Our work and some crucial bounds of our proof were motivated by the methods used in a recent paper of C. Cacciapuoti, A. Maltsev and B. Schlein, [8], where the authors improved the log-factor dependence in (1.3) in the sub-Gaussian case.…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The result (1.3) under the conditions (C0) was proved in a series of papers [11], [9], [31] with an n-dependent value β = c log log n. In [18] we gave a self-contained proof based on the methods developed in [28], [23] while at the same time reducing the power of log n from β = c log log n to β = 2. Our work and some crucial bounds of our proof were motivated by the methods used in a recent paper of C. Cacciapuoti, A. Maltsev and B. Schlein, [8], where the authors improved the log-factor dependence in (1.3) in the sub-Gaussian case.…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Recently Götze and Tikhomirov [28] proved the bound ∆ n = O(n −1 ) assuming that µ 8 < ∞ or µ 4 < ∞ combined with the assumption |X jk | ≤ Cn 1 4 a.s. Finally in [22] the following theorem was proved Theorem 1.6. Assume that the conditions (C0) hold.…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…for some δ > 0, see e.g. [7], [5], [20], [13], [14], [15], [18] and [17]. In particular, the result of [17] implies that (1.4) holds with α(n) ≡ 1.…”
Section: Introduction and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The bound for E |T n (z)| p is given in Theorem 2.1. The crucial step in [21], [18] was to show that finiteness of eight moments suffices to show that max 1≤j≤n E |R jj (z)| p ≤ C p 0 for all 1 ≤ p ≤ C(nv) 1 4 and v ≥ v 0 . The proof of this fact was based on the descent method developed in [5][Lemma 3.4] (see Lemma 4.1 below), but used in proving bounds for moments of the diagonal entries R jj (z) only.…”
Section: Main Resultmentioning
confidence: 99%