2010
DOI: 10.1007/s12220-010-9190-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal Bounds on the Modulus of Continuity of the Uncentered Hardy–Littlewood Maximal Function

Abstract: We obtain sharp bounds for the modulus of continuity of the uncentered maximal function in terms of the modulus of continuity of the given function, via integral formulas. Some of the results deduced from these formulas are the following: The best constants for Lipschitz and Hölder functions on proper subintervals ofIn higher dimensions, we determine the asymptotic behavior, as d → ∞, of the norm of the maximal operator associated with cross-polytopes, Euclidean balls, and cubes, that is, p balls for p = 1, 2,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the methods used in [13] and [12] cannot tell us whether we actually have c p < 1, that is, whether the maximal operator M has a smoothing effect on f . For p = 1, Theorem 2.5 of [2] states that DMf 1 Df 1 , and c 1 = 1 is sharp, while for p = ∞, we have DMf ∞ ( √ 2 − 1) Df ∞ and c ∞ = ( √ 2 − 1) is best possible, by [1]. Thus, it is natural to conjecture "by interpolation" that whenever 1 < p < ∞, the optimal constant c p satisfies c p < 1, and furthermore, lim p→∞ c p = √ 2 − 1.…”
Section: Proofmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the methods used in [13] and [12] cannot tell us whether we actually have c p < 1, that is, whether the maximal operator M has a smoothing effect on f . For p = 1, Theorem 2.5 of [2] states that DMf 1 Df 1 , and c 1 = 1 is sharp, while for p = ∞, we have DMf ∞ ( √ 2 − 1) Df ∞ and c ∞ = ( √ 2 − 1) is best possible, by [1]. Thus, it is natural to conjecture "by interpolation" that whenever 1 < p < ∞, the optimal constant c p satisfies c p < 1, and furthermore, lim p→∞ c p = √ 2 − 1.…”
Section: Proofmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In fact, it is the standard argument: From a refined Young's inequality one obtains a refined Hölder inequality, which E-mail addresses: jesus.munarrizaldaz@dmc.unirioja.es, jesus.munarriz@uam.es. 1 Current address: Departamento de Matemáticas, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Cantoblanco 28049, Madrid, Spain. 2 The author was partially supported by Grant MTM2006-13000-C03-03 of the DGI of Spain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, |m d |} ≤ r n }. We now introduce the local maxima and minima of a discrete function g : Z → R. 1 We say that an interval [n, m] is a string of local maxima of g if g(n − 1) < g(n) = . .…”
Section: Proof Of Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kinnunen's original result was later extended to a local setting in [14], to a fractional setting in [15] and to a multilinear setting in [9]. Other works on the regularity of maximal operators in Sobolev spaces and other function spaces include [1,16,18,23,25,28].The understanding of the action of M on the endpoint spacewas raised by Haj lasz and Onninen in [12] and remains unsolved in its full generality. A complete solution was reached only in dimension d = 1 in [2, 17, 29] and partial progress on the general case d > 1 was obtained by Haj lasz and Malý [11] and, more recently, by Saari [26] and Luiro [22].Let us elaborate on the achievements in dimension d = 1 since these will be quite important for our purposes here.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%