2008 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics 2009
DOI: 10.1109/robio.2009.4913204
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal camera placement considering mobile robot trajectory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Autonomous patrolling robots are to have significant contributions in security applications for surveillance purposes (Briggs and Donald 2000;Cassinis and Tampalini 2007). In the near future robots will also be used in home environments to provide assistance for the elderly and challenged people (Nikolaidis et al 2009;Biegelbauer et al 2010).…”
Section: Surveillance With Mobile Robotsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Autonomous patrolling robots are to have significant contributions in security applications for surveillance purposes (Briggs and Donald 2000;Cassinis and Tampalini 2007). In the near future robots will also be used in home environments to provide assistance for the elderly and challenged people (Nikolaidis et al 2009;Biegelbauer et al 2010).…”
Section: Surveillance With Mobile Robotsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While we have assumed full observability of the scene, we plan to account for sensing limitations in the future [29], [30]. Future work also includes using learning to improve the planning efficiency [4] and extending the developed techniques to more general MR-TAMP problems [3] and more diverse environments [31], [32].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, we: explained the need for precise robot localization at a home environment and verified the importance of the camera pose at the robot localization process divided the problem of optimal camera placement into two sub-objectives: a) place the cameras in order to maximize the area covered (single-objective case) b) place the cameras in order to maximize the area covered and minimize the average localization error of the visible area (multi-objective case) approached sub-objective (a) by a genetic algorithm and quantitively compared its performance with the steepest descent method used in past research [15]. approached sub-objective (b) by the NSGA genetic algorithm.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We optimize the pose of cameras for the same evaluation criteria using the steepest descent method. The steepest descent method was used for the camera placement optimization problem in [15]. Results are included in Fig.…”
Section: The Environment Is a 490[m] X 455[m] X 23[m]mentioning
confidence: 99%