2018 Workshop on Communication Networks and Power Systems (WCNPS) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/wcnps.2018.8604320
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal Capacitor Allocation and Sizing in Distribution Networks Using Particle Swarm Optimization Algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to avoid this situation, several improvements can be made to the inertia weight value, such as utilizing the concept of "a time-decreasing inertia weight" theorem [5]. This concept has the ability to expedite the convergence of particles toward the ideal solution and hence decrease the number of iterations required.…”
Section: Researc Methods 21 Modified Particle Swarm Optimization (Mpso)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to avoid this situation, several improvements can be made to the inertia weight value, such as utilizing the concept of "a time-decreasing inertia weight" theorem [5]. This concept has the ability to expedite the convergence of particles toward the ideal solution and hence decrease the number of iterations required.…”
Section: Researc Methods 21 Modified Particle Swarm Optimization (Mpso)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Capacitors are generally the most economical; hence they attract more studies. Chunks of research such as in [37]- [43] worked on the optimal sizing and allocation of capacitors in a distributed network through the use of meta-heuristic algorithms. Other power electronic devices such as STATCOM, which consists of coupling transformers, energy storage devices, and inverters [44], have also been optimally placed and sized.…”
Section: B Power Electronic Unitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The study can be further extended by evaluating the algorithm on a test bus system and comparing with other algorithms. In [43], PSO was suggested to optimally size and allocate capacitors in a distribution network, to reduce real power losses and economic costs. The algorithm was evaluated on 34-bus and 85-bus system, and results from a comparison with the WOA show that the PSO had higher voltage profile improvement.…”
Section: B Swarm-based Algorithmsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 1 lists the results of capacitor placement for 33-bus distribution network obtained by different indices, namely, LSF, LSI 1 , LSI 2 , LSI and TLI when 2, 3, 4, 5 problem is solved by the optimizer with respect to the determined high potential buses (capacitor placement on the other buses is ignored). When two buses are considered, candidate buses based on LSF, LSI 1 , LSI 2 , LSI, and TLI are (28, 29), (3,6), (6,28), (3,6) and (30, 33), respectively. In this case, after doing the second level, it is observed that the minimum objective function value belongs to TLI (76 068.44 $).…”
Section: F I G U R E 5 Schematic Of 33-bus Distribution Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although GA is a population‐based algorithm, which usually leads to better results than trajectory‐based algorithms, it suffers from premature convergence owing to the loss of population diversity at early stages of search process. Particle swarm optimization (PSO) has been applied to CPP in Reference 5, 6. Like GA, PSO is a population‐based algorithm which suffers from stagnation and may be trapped in local optima when the system under consideration is large.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%