2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.apor.2013.03.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal causal control of a wave energy converter in a random sea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
73
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 119 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
73
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The principal goal of the mooring system is to keep the floating structure in position within specific tolerances in both under normal load conditions and severe storm load conditions. The assumed optimal angle of each tether is 55 degrees [23]. The details of physical WECs characteristics, including submergence and ocean depth can be found in [12].…”
Section: Power Absorption Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The principal goal of the mooring system is to keep the floating structure in position within specific tolerances in both under normal load conditions and severe storm load conditions. The assumed optimal angle of each tether is 55 degrees [23]. The details of physical WECs characteristics, including submergence and ocean depth can be found in [12].…”
Section: Power Absorption Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The time-averaged mechanical power input into the generator is given by (21) Dividing both sides of (21) by allows one to insert (19) leading to (22) The optimum constant and continuous generator damping at each frequency can be obtained from calculus by setting the partial derivative of (22) equal to 0 and solving for . This leads to (23) where resonance , which is consistent with the wellknown results from [2] and [40].…”
Section: Coupled Floater-pto System Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With point absorbers, the utilization of linear (-motion) electric generators eliminate the need for additional conversion methods such as crank gearing and drives [8]- [13]. Furthermore, the control of point absorbers and other ocean energy harvesting devices has been a topic of great interest in the ocean engineering community [14]- [22]. Some of the strategies investigated include reactive control, adaptive tuning, inertia adjustment, latching, and linear quadratic Gaussian (LQG) design.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While some WEC control algorithms circumvent the need to predict future variations in free surface elevation or excitation force (Fusco and Ringwood, 2013;Scruggs et al, 2013), in general there is a need to provide forecast values of free surface elevation or excitation force due to the non-causality of the optimal PTO force, as articulated in Section 4. Fortunately, there is a strong positive connection between the wave forecasting requirements of energy maximising control (Fusco and Ringwood, 2012) and the forecastability of random seas , due to the close relationship between the radiation damping dynamics and the design sea state (i.e.…”
Section: Wave Forecastingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the chief difficulties in applying MPC to a performance function of the form of (26) is that the performance function is, in general, non-convex. The closely related optimal LQG problem for wave energy devices has been studied by Scruggs et al (2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%