2013
DOI: 10.1109/tmi.2013.2263388
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal Co-Segmentation of Tumor in PET-CT Images With Context Information

Abstract: PET-CT images have been widely used in clinical practice for radiotherapy treatment planning of the radiotherapy. Many existing segmentation approaches only work for a single imaging modality, which suffer from the low spatial resolution in PET or low contrast in CT. In this work we propose a novel method for the co-segmentation of the tumor in both PET and CT images, which makes use of advantages from each modality: the functionality information from PET and the anatomical structure information from CT. The a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
149
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 124 publications
(151 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
2
149
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently a graph-cut based method was developed to segment CT (anatomical) and PET (functional) images simultaneously over two discrete image graphs by enforcing an inter-surface context cost (Song et al, 2013). This approach made use of image information from both modalities and incorporated the introduced context cost to achieve spatial consistency.…”
Section: Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently a graph-cut based method was developed to segment CT (anatomical) and PET (functional) images simultaneously over two discrete image graphs by enforcing an inter-surface context cost (Song et al, 2013). This approach made use of image information from both modalities and incorporated the introduced context cost to achieve spatial consistency.…”
Section: Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Han et al 42 developed a graph-based Markov random field segmentation with a regularized energy term that penalizes the segmentation difference between PET and CT. In recognition of possible differences of tumour volume defined in PET from that defined in CT, Song et al 43 extended the work of Han et al to generate tumour volumes in both modalities, rather than a compromised identical one (Figure 2). Both works required empirical determination of multiple parameters.…”
Section: Semiautomatic Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The location and the size of the organs are not contained in the structure information. Because of this structure information the identification of the foreground seeds are not facilitated and produced the ambiguity This work is motivated by Song's method [16] in which the labelling of Markov Random Field (MRF) is formulated on the graph on PET and CT images. The main advantage of this method is its good performance in capturing the fuzzy boundary of the tumour on PET images.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%