1999
DOI: 10.1006/jagm.1998.0990
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal Coarsening of Unstructured Meshes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Miller et al proposed a function-based coarsening method in 2D [6]. Compared with maximal independent set (MIS)-based methods for vertex connectivity graphs, it gives better results.…”
Section: Function-based Coarseningmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Miller et al proposed a function-based coarsening method in 2D [6]. Compared with maximal independent set (MIS)-based methods for vertex connectivity graphs, it gives better results.…”
Section: Function-based Coarseningmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…To devise a mesh decimation method for CAE applications, the following additional criteria should be considered: (a) watertightness of the resulting mesh, (b) mesh quality, in terms of element geometric shape and smooth size variation, (c) local curvature on the surface and (d) volume thickness. Several mesh decimation algorithms for CAE applications have been presented in the literature [6,7]. Some of them are limited to 2D models.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent work by Miller et al [11] provides a remedy. They construct an MIS not of the vertex connectivity graph but of a con ict graph.…”
Section: Selection Of Points To Include In the Coarse Meshmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Recently, work in mesh generation by bubble packing has produced spin-o s in mesh coarsening. Speciÿcally, Miller et al [11] have shown that the proper criterion for whether two ÿne mesh vertices can both be allowed in the coarse mesh is the distance between them relative to a measure of the mesh length scale at each vertex. They were able to show that using this criterion the quality of the coarse mesh is bounded below for any given ÿne mesh.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The classical approach is purely combinatorial, i.e., it does not take any property of the embedding into account. This can lead to deteriorating aspect ratios as pointed out by Miller et al [51]. To enable control over the quality of the coarser triangulation we prioritize half-edge contractions based on edge length (effectively removing the shortest edges first) to favor uniform triangle sizes at a given level of the hierarchy.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%