2018
DOI: 10.1186/s12938-018-0617-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal combination of electrodes and conductive gels for brain electrical impedance tomography

Abstract: BackgroundElectrical impedance tomography (EIT) is an emerging imaging technology that has been used to monitor brain injury and detect acute stroke. The time and frequency properties of electrode–skin contact impedance are important for brain EIT because brain EIT measurement is performed over a long period when used to monitor brain injury, and is carried out across a wide range of frequencies when used to detect stroke. To our knowledge, no study has simultaneously investigated the time and frequency proper… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All electrodes were installed on the head of subjects according to figure 2. The Ag/AgCl wet electrode was used as the reference electrode and the ground electrode, which was coated with Ten20® conductive gel to enhance its conductivity performance [32,33]. Before installing the hydrogel electrode, it is necessary to wipe the electrode with water to remove the dust on it.…”
Section: Electrode Installationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All electrodes were installed on the head of subjects according to figure 2. The Ag/AgCl wet electrode was used as the reference electrode and the ground electrode, which was coated with Ten20® conductive gel to enhance its conductivity performance [32,33]. Before installing the hydrogel electrode, it is necessary to wipe the electrode with water to remove the dust on it.…”
Section: Electrode Installationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although noninvasive methods for accurate measurement of contact impedance are not available, common methods for indirect estimation of contact impedance include the two-electrode method [32], [33] and reconstruction method [34]- [36]. The two-electrode method yields the sum of the contact impedances of two electrode-skin interfaces, and thus cannot provide the contact impedance of any individual interface.…”
Section: B Reference Electrode Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Skin-electrode impedance measurements revealed that the printed 5% PUD/PEDOT:PSS electrodes on the Ecoflex substrate had slightly lower impedance, exhibiting comparable performance to commercial electrodes (figure 7(a)). Nonetheless, it should be noted that skin-electrode impedance measurements can differ greatly depending on the person [46] and ambient conditions such as temperature and humidity. Using the 5% PUD/PEDOT:PSS epidermal electrodes, electromyogram (figure 7 PEDOT:PSS-based dry electrodes reported in literature and a commercialized dry electrode fabricated using photolithography.…”
Section: Electrophysiological Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%