2019
DOI: 10.1109/access.2019.2918299
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal Configuration Analysis of AOA Localization and Optimal Heading Angles Generation Method for UAV Swarms

Abstract: In this paper, the angle-of-arrival (AOA) measurements are adapted to locate a target using the UAV swarms equipped with passive receivers. The measurement noise is considered to be target-to-receiver distance dependent. The Cramer-Rao low bound (CRLB) of the AOA localization is calculated, and the optimal deployments are explored through changing angular separations and distances. Then, a distributed collaborative autonomous generation (DCAG) method is proposed based on the deep neural network (NN). The off-l… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among the different available indoor location techniques, those based on Received Signal Strength Indicator (RSSI) or Received Signal Strength (RSS) have proved their accuracy when positioning in limited areas [101,102], but their heavily depend on characteristics of the scenario (e.g., presence of metallic objects) and on the used UAV hardware (e.g., antennas) [103]. There are also positioning techniques based on computing the Angle of Arrival (AoA) of the received signals [104], or their time of arrival (through Time of Arrival (ToA) and Time Difference of Arrival (TDoA) techniques) [105].…”
Section: Positioning Subsystemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among the different available indoor location techniques, those based on Received Signal Strength Indicator (RSSI) or Received Signal Strength (RSS) have proved their accuracy when positioning in limited areas [101,102], but their heavily depend on characteristics of the scenario (e.g., presence of metallic objects) and on the used UAV hardware (e.g., antennas) [103]. There are also positioning techniques based on computing the Angle of Arrival (AoA) of the received signals [104], or their time of arrival (through Time of Arrival (ToA) and Time Difference of Arrival (TDoA) techniques) [105].…”
Section: Positioning Subsystemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The A-optimality criterion minimizes the trace of the inverse FIM, which minimizes the mean squared error (MSE) of the estimates. The Aoptimality criterion has been used to determine optimal flight paths for multiple UAVs using AoA measurements to localize a stationary target [20,21] or a moving target [22][23][24], and for 3D AoA target localization [25,26]. The diversity of the eigenvalues of the FIM has been used as an alternative criterion for the optimal placement of sensors for target position estimation [27].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Localization schemes based on TOA or TDOA offer high precision, but this comes at the cost of a very complex process of accurate time synchronization among all users [27]. This localization requires multiple receivers or stations [28]- [30] and its performance is also highly related to the receiver-target deployment [31]. Ultra-wide bandwidth-based systems are commonly used in the localization community to obtain desirable localization performance and simple multipath mitigation without costly estimators but at the cost of a large bandwidth [32].…”
Section: A Uav Positioning and Trackingmentioning
confidence: 99%