2018
DOI: 10.3390/app8122633
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal Configuration of Different Energy Storage Batteries for Providing Auxiliary Service and Economic Revenue

Abstract: Energy storage providing auxiliary service at the user-side has broad prospects in support of national polices. Three auxiliary services are selected as the application scene for energy storage participating in demand management, peak shaving and demand response. Considering the time value of funds, the user-side energy storage economy model is built. The model comprehensively considers the delayed transformation income, the government subsidy income, the auxiliary service income and the whole-life-cycle cost … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The greater the benefit of the pipeline company, the stronger its dependence on others, the lower the bargaining power in negotiation, and the smaller α i in Equation (11). The economic benefits of pipeline companies can be measured by indexes such as a net investment income, payback period, and cost-benefit ratio [22]. Then, the coefficient α i indicating the bargaining power of pipeline company in the negotiation of UUT construction cost allocation can be expressed as:…”
Section: Comprehensive Decision-making Mechanism Of Uut Cost Allocatimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The greater the benefit of the pipeline company, the stronger its dependence on others, the lower the bargaining power in negotiation, and the smaller α i in Equation (11). The economic benefits of pipeline companies can be measured by indexes such as a net investment income, payback period, and cost-benefit ratio [22]. Then, the coefficient α i indicating the bargaining power of pipeline company in the negotiation of UUT construction cost allocation can be expressed as:…”
Section: Comprehensive Decision-making Mechanism Of Uut Cost Allocatimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After this claim, an optimal-sized BESS was designed by Ding et al [21] for the industrial load and by Olivieri and McConky for the residential load with a major focus on emission reduction [22]. Chen et al compared the optimal performance of four diferent energy storage batteries to generate economic revenue and provide auxiliary services to industrial users [23]. Tese research projects elucidate that the optimum scheduling and sizing of the BESS depend on the constraints and conditions for which the storage system is to be designed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To minimize the total cost of BESS, the optimal size of BESS was evaluated based on frequency control in [7]. The authors in [8] developed an energy storage optimization configuration model considering various benefits to maximize user revenue within the lifecycle of BESS. In addition, the size of BESS was also determined to cope with the time-space imbalance of wind power generation and system revenue maximization considering the equivalent loss of BESS cycle life [9] and capacity fading of lithium ion battery [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%