2017
DOI: 10.1111/1756-2171.12169
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal contracts for research agents

Abstract: We study the agency problem between a firm and its research employees under several scenarios characterized by different Research and Development (R&D) unit setups. In a multiagent dynamic contracting setting, we describe the precise pattern of the optimal contract. We illustrate that the optimal incentive regime is a function of how agents' efforts interact with one another: relative performance evaluation is used when their efforts are substitutes, whereas joint performance evaluation is used when their effo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In other settings, a principal may want to motivate agents' effort to increase the arrival rate of "good" arrivals. Shan (2017), for example, considers a principal hiring two agents to carry out a multistage project, whose successful outcomes follow a Poisson process with a rate jointly determined by the effort choices of both agents. The study considers free riding issues when the total effort levels determine the arrival rate, an aspect that we do not consider.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other settings, a principal may want to motivate agents' effort to increase the arrival rate of "good" arrivals. Shan (2017), for example, considers a principal hiring two agents to carry out a multistage project, whose successful outcomes follow a Poisson process with a rate jointly determined by the effort choices of both agents. The study considers free riding issues when the total effort levels determine the arrival rate, an aspect that we do not consider.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main distinction of our paper is that we consider an infrastructure construction problem in which the time to finish the project is stochastic and the construction follows a Poisson process. In addition, our theoretical setting is also related to the optimal dynamic contracting with moral-hazard in a Poisson framework (e.g., Biais et al 2010;Myerson 2015;Shan 2017;Sun and Tian 2018). Our paper applies this method to study the role of NDBs and contribute the related literature by investigating the contract implementation through an optimal capital structure of an infrastructure project.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Uncertainty about project quality is crucial to our analysis. Green and Taylor (2016), Hu (2014), and Shan (2017) consider principal one‐agent models with multistage projects without uncertainty about the quality of each stage. In our setting, under no uncertainty, the principal can implement efficient effort at no informational cost.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%