2017
DOI: 10.1109/tits.2016.2633164
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal Control of Connected Vehicle Systems With Communication Delay and Driver Reaction Time

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
74
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 167 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
74
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that the optimization problem (31) is a convex linear matrix inequality (LMI) in variables (ω 2 d , 1 k d , Q) and can be solved using efficient LMI solvers. Also notice that the tracking error bound (30) implies that if the local reference signals are static, i.e., R ∆r ∞ = γ = 0, for any admissible delay, algorithm (9) converges to the exact average of the reference inputs. Because in connected undirected graphs all the non-zero eigenvalues of Laplacian matrix are real and satisfy 0 < δβλ i < 1, i ∈ {2, · · · , N }, algorithm (9) is guaranteed to tolerate, at least, one step delay as π 2 arcsin( δ β λ i 2 ) > 3.…”
Section: B Discrete-time Casementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Note that the optimization problem (31) is a convex linear matrix inequality (LMI) in variables (ω 2 d , 1 k d , Q) and can be solved using efficient LMI solvers. Also notice that the tracking error bound (30) implies that if the local reference signals are static, i.e., R ∆r ∞ = γ = 0, for any admissible delay, algorithm (9) converges to the exact average of the reference inputs. Because in connected undirected graphs all the non-zero eigenvalues of Laplacian matrix are real and satisfy 0 < δβλ i < 1, i ∈ {2, · · · , N }, algorithm (9) is guaranteed to tolerate, at least, one step delay as π 2 arcsin( δ β λ i 2 ) > 3.…”
Section: B Discrete-time Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of these references address important practical considerations such as the dynamic average consensus over changing topologies and over networks with event-triggered communication strategy, however, the dynamic average consensus in the presence of communication time delay has not been addressed. This paper intends to fill this gap as delays are inevitable in the real systems and are known to cause disruptive behavior such as network instability or the network desynchronization [28], [29], [30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples range from the control of single-atom trajectories 1 to the development of brain-device interfaces, 2 from the treatment of human diseases using closed-loop drug delivery systems, 3 to the design of driverless automobiles. 4 An important component of these controllers is an analog-to-digital (A/D) conversion by which a continuous (or analog) signal is converted into a series of numbers proportional to the signal. This A/D conversion is essential to enable the digital microprocessors to track the controlled variable: the reverse D/A conversion makes it possible for the microprocessor to affect control.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Platooning control has been a longstanding problem in control engineering, encompassing a vast literature. For a series of recent, interesting results also providing a good outline of existing literature we refer to [49], [50]. To the best of the authors's knowledge, the current results are the only ones guaranteeing collision avoidance and topology preservation for heterogenous, nonlinear dynamical agents in the presence of communication induced time-delays, as outlinen in Section V below.…”
Section: Platooning Controlmentioning
confidence: 93%