Proceedings of the 2005, American Control Conference, 2005.
DOI: 10.1109/acc.2005.1470086
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal control of drug delivery to brain tumors for a distributed parameters model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [2], [3] the Crank-Nicolson implicit method combined with predictor-corrector methods are used to study the problem numerically. However, using finite difference methods like Crank-Nicolson implicit method alone and alternating directions implicit method have serious drawbacks.…”
Section: Galerkin Finite Element Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In [2], [3] the Crank-Nicolson implicit method combined with predictor-corrector methods are used to study the problem numerically. However, using finite difference methods like Crank-Nicolson implicit method alone and alternating directions implicit method have serious drawbacks.…”
Section: Galerkin Finite Element Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the distributed parameter control model of Chakrabarty and Hanson [2], [3], the tumor cell and normal cell density and the drug concentration at any position vector x and time t ∈ [0, t f ], in the interior Ω of the domain, denoted by n 1 (x, t), n 2 (x, t) and c(x, t) respectively, are taken as the state variables. Defining the global state vector as…”
Section: Mathematical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations