2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2021.110373
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal control of volume-preserving mean curvature flow

Abstract: We develop a framework and numerical method for controlling the full space-time tube of a geometrically driven flow. We consider an optimal control problem for the mean curvature flow of a curve or surface with a volume constraint, where the control parameter acts as a forcing term in the motion law. The control of the trajectory of the flow is achieved by minimizing an appropriate tracking-type cost functional. The gradient of the cost functional is obtained via a formal sensitivity analysis of the space-time… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
(53 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several strategies for increasing mesh quality, not based on mesh deformation methods mentioned or Laplacian smoothing, exist. In the context of shape optimization and -morphing, these include correcting for errors, frequently arising in discretizations of Hadamard's theorem (Etling et al, 2018), adding non-linear advection terms in shape gradient representations (Onyshkevych and Siebenborn, 2020), approximating shape morphing by volume-preserving mean-curvature flows (Laurain and Walker, 2020), and use of techniques related to centroidal Voronoi reparameterization in combination with eikonal equation based non-linear advection terms for representation of shape gradients (Schmidt, 2014).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several strategies for increasing mesh quality, not based on mesh deformation methods mentioned or Laplacian smoothing, exist. In the context of shape optimization and -morphing, these include correcting for errors, frequently arising in discretizations of Hadamard's theorem (Etling et al, 2018), adding non-linear advection terms in shape gradient representations (Onyshkevych and Siebenborn, 2020), approximating shape morphing by volume-preserving mean-curvature flows (Laurain and Walker, 2020), and use of techniques related to centroidal Voronoi reparameterization in combination with eikonal equation based non-linear advection terms for representation of shape gradients (Schmidt, 2014).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several strategies for increasing mesh quality not based on mesh deformation methods mentioned or Laplacian smoothing exist. In the context of shape optimization and -morphing, these include correcting for errors in Hadamard's theorem due to discretization [16], adding non-linear advection terms in shape gradient representations [36], approximating shape morphing by volume-preserving mean-curvature flows [28], and use of techniques related to Centroidal Voronoi Reparameterization in combination with Eikonal equation based non-linear advection terms for representation of shape gradients [40].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%