2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00245-015-9295-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal Control with Restrictions for a Diffusion Risk Model Under Constant Interest Force

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the context of dynamic proportional reinsurance, [7] derived the optimal reinsurance strategy that maximizes the expected discounted future surpluses; [16] derived the optimal reinsurance strategy which minimizes the ruin probability in the classical risk model and its diffusion approximation; [10] studied optimal reinsurance under the criterion of maximizing adjustment coefficient for a diffusion risk model as well as a jump-diffusion risk model; [22] considered the objective of maximizing the expected exponential utility and derived optimal reinsurance strategy for a risk model with common shock dependence under the expected value premium principle; [11] examined the same optimal problem under the variance premium principle; and [14] studied optimal dividend problems in a diffusion risk model under constant interest force.…”
Section: Xin Jiang Kam Chuen Yuen and MI Chenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the context of dynamic proportional reinsurance, [7] derived the optimal reinsurance strategy that maximizes the expected discounted future surpluses; [16] derived the optimal reinsurance strategy which minimizes the ruin probability in the classical risk model and its diffusion approximation; [10] studied optimal reinsurance under the criterion of maximizing adjustment coefficient for a diffusion risk model as well as a jump-diffusion risk model; [22] considered the objective of maximizing the expected exponential utility and derived optimal reinsurance strategy for a risk model with common shock dependence under the expected value premium principle; [11] examined the same optimal problem under the variance premium principle; and [14] studied optimal dividend problems in a diffusion risk model under constant interest force.…”
Section: Xin Jiang Kam Chuen Yuen and MI Chenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e study of dividend strategies for the insurance risk model was first proposed by De Finetti [1], and he found that the optimal strategy must be a barrier strategy in the studied discrete time model. Since then, many scholars have tried to work out the dividend problems under more general and more realistic model assumptions, for example, Claramunt et al [2], Zhou [3], Landriault [4], Gerber et al [5], Chen et al [6], Chen and Yuen [7], and Peng et al [8,9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The extensively studied risk models for the optimal dividend problem in the literature include diffusion model, Cramér-Lundberg model, jump-diffusion model and Lévy risk model. For example, Asmussen and Taksar (1997), Højgaard and Taksar (1999), Asmussen et al (2000), Paulsen (2003), Gerber and Shiu (2004), Løkka and Zervos (2008), He and Liang (2008), Bai et al (2010), Chen et al (2013), Yao et al (2014Yao et al ( , 2016, Peng et al (2016), Vierkötter and Schmidli (2017), Zhu (2017), and Liang and Palmowski (2018) considered the optimal dividend problem in the diffusion model; Højgaard (2002), Azcue and Muler (2005), Schmidli (2006), Gerber and Shiu (2006), Albrecher and Thonhauser (2008), and Azcue and Muler (2012) studied the optimal dividend strategy under the Cramér-Lundberg model. As for other risk models such as the jump-diffusion model and the Lévy risk model, recent related research can be found in Avram et al (2007Avram et al ( , 2015, Kyprianou and Palmowski (2007), Loeffen (2008Loeffen ( , 2009, Loeffen and Renaud (2010), Czarna and Palmowski (2010), Wang and Hu (2012), Hunting and Paulsen (2013), Hernandez and Junca (2015), Zhao et al (2017), Pérez et al (2018), , Wang and Zhou (2018), Wang and Zhang (2019), etc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%