2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2014.10.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal descriptor as a translator of eclectic data into prediction of cytotoxicity for metal oxide nanoparticles under different conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
73
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 90 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
1
73
0
Order By: Relevance
“…16 There are criteria for validation of the QSPR/QSAR models which were suggested during last decade. [17][18][19][20][21] However, in fact, all suggested criteria of the predictability of QSPR/QSAR models are based on the analysis of the geometry of data points in the plot of experimental versus calculated values of an endpoint and typically are obtained for the experiments in the training and test sets. 17- 21 We deem that the split into the training and test sets has significant influence on the statistical quality of a model for both the training and the test sets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 There are criteria for validation of the QSPR/QSAR models which were suggested during last decade. [17][18][19][20][21] However, in fact, all suggested criteria of the predictability of QSPR/QSAR models are based on the analysis of the geometry of data points in the plot of experimental versus calculated values of an endpoint and typically are obtained for the experiments in the training and test sets. 17- 21 We deem that the split into the training and test sets has significant influence on the statistical quality of a model for both the training and the test sets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Having data for a series of runs of the Monte Carlo optimization with different splits, one can extract promoters of pIC 50 increase (positive correlation weights for all runs) and promoters of pIC 50 decrease (negative correlation weights for all runs) [11]. Examples of promoters of increase for the pIC 50 are (i) EC1 ¼9,10,13 for carbon atoms; (ii) presence of three aromatic six-members rings without heteroatoms; (iii) presence of one seven-members ring with heteroatoms.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The measure of influence of a feature F k for possible predictive potential of a model can be estimated via defect of F k , defect(F k ) calculated as the following [31,32]:…”
Section: Domain Of Applicabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%