2016
DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2016.1248945
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal design and endpoint of clinical trials using immune checkpoint blocking agents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because of this unique feature, the milestone PFS rate at specific late time point (that is, durable control) better reflects the benefit of PD-1 blockade. [4][5][6][7] Although debate exists, 7 cancer cell expression of PD-L1 as measured by immunohistochemistry (IHC) or T-cell infiltration has been suggested as a biomarker predicting response before treatment begins. 22 In our data of real clinical practice, there were only 7 patients that had accessible record of PD-L1 IHC measurement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because of this unique feature, the milestone PFS rate at specific late time point (that is, durable control) better reflects the benefit of PD-1 blockade. [4][5][6][7] Although debate exists, 7 cancer cell expression of PD-L1 as measured by immunohistochemistry (IHC) or T-cell infiltration has been suggested as a biomarker predicting response before treatment begins. 22 In our data of real clinical practice, there were only 7 patients that had accessible record of PD-L1 IHC measurement.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3 Compared to molecular targeted agents, the response rate to PD-1 blockade is low (15-30%), but also maintained for a long period of time. [4][5][6][7] Programmed cell-death protein ligand 1 (PD-L1) has been known as a biomarker which is associated with favorable clinical response, but the measurement is not widely available.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The efficacy and safety of ICI differs from cytotoxic chemotherapy or molecular-targeted agents. 5 No correlation has been observed between dose and efficacy in phase I clinical trials with ICIs, and no dose–toxicity relationship has been evident. The maximal tolerated dose (MTD) for nivolumab has not been identified, and a similar safety profile has been demonstrated across tumour types and dose levels (0.1–10 mg/kg).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ICIs influence Tcells to selectively identify cancer cells and indirectly potentiate their attack on cancer cells. 4 ICIs have shown no correlation between dose and efficacy or dose and toxicity in initial phase I trials. The studies were not able to recognize the maximal tolerated dose (MTD) for nivolumab and at various dose levels ranging from 0.1 to 10 mg/kg, there is no difference in safety profile.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ICIs influence T-cells to selectively identify cancer cells and indirectly potentiate their attack on cancer cells. 4…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%