Optimal design methods for a digital human-computer interface based on human reliability in a nuclear power plant

Jiang, Jianjun; Zhang, Li; Xie, Tao; Wu, Daqing; Li, Min; Wang, Yiqun; Peng, Yuyuan; Peng, Jie; Zhang, Mengjia; Li, Peiyao; Ma, Congmin; wu, Xing

doi:10.1016/j.anucene.2017.03.003

Cited by 3 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 13 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Because of the subjective complexity of human reliability of the working interface system, a few mathematical models of human reliability evaluation are applied on working interface design and there is a lack of quantitative research. Nowadays, the majority of research about interface design is in the field of computing for better programming and technical quality [9], and the ergonomic research about interface design is growing gradually [10], but there is little research on human reliability about interface design and it is focused on the field of nuclear power plant based on probability mapping function mainly [11]. Because of the large amount of information and complex information relationship of the man-machine interaction in the working interface system, unlike the common entertainment product interface, it needs more rigorous cooperation between people and the system, and the organization and presentation of information are more scientific [12].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…e index system of human reliability evaluation for complex interface design 11. fuzzy semantics; L 12 limited vision; L 13 optical illusion; L 14 weak visibility; L 15 cognitive biases C 2 memory lapse L 21 thinking load; L 22 forgotten; L 23 false memories; L 24 inaccurate recall; L 25 lack of memory assistance; L 26 time pressure C 3 carelessness L 31 diminished intention; L 32 overconfidence; L 33 interference; L 34 nervous at a loss; L 35 information overload C 4 improper decisions making L 41 wrong planning target; L 42 information misunderstanding; L 43 the empirical; L 44 no plan; L 45 plan missing; L 46 reasonably planned but not executed according to the plan C 5 improper operation L 51 inadequate training; L 52 improper operating procedure; L 53 taking shortcuts; L 54 habitual control; L 55 illegal manipulation; L 56 lack of operational knowledge; L 57 wrong operation time…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Human Reliability Evaluation Based on Objective and Subjective Comprehensive Method Used for Ergonomic Interface Design

Liu

Chen

et al. 2021

Mathematical Problems in Engineering

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In the process of machining, the operator’s incorrect operation using the control human-computer interaction interface may lead to a disastrous effect on the whole production chain such as task failure and system failure. The eight types of using errors about human-computer interaction interface system (misperception, memory lapse, carelessness, improper decision-making, improper operation, improper interface layout design, improper icon and text display design, and improper prompt feedback) are proposed based on the cognition from users. According to the eight types of using error, the human reliability and safety evaluation method is proposed. Considering the variability objective and uncertainty subjective factors in the human-machine interaction process, the human reliability evaluation method is proposed based on objective and subjective comprehensive weighting under ergonomic principles. Firstly, based on the investigation of relevant machine tool interface design, the comprehensive evaluation index system for man-machine reliability of complex interface design is established. Secondly, an objective and subjective comprehensive weight assignment method as the composition of Theilʼs entropy weight method combined with TOPSIS (Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to an Ideal Solution) and improved AHP (analytic hierarchy process) method combined with fuzzy mathematics is proposed. It can not only effectively avoid the impact of excessive subjective factors on empowerment but also fully excavate the real information in the survey data and improve the objectivity and accuracy of the weight data of evaluation indicators at all levels. Thirdly, taking the interface design of CNC machine tool equipment for example, the best human-computer interaction interface design schemes are chosen according to the human reliability evaluation method based on objective and subjective comprehensive method calculated by Entropy-TOPSIS-AHP. Finally, based on eye movement experiments, the use efficiency and accuracy of the human-computer interaction interface design scheme chosen by the assessment method are better than the other design schemes or original one to verify the assessment method validity.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Human Reliability Evaluation Based on Objective and Subjective Comprehensive Method Used for Ergonomic Interface Design

Liu

Chen

et al. 2021

Mathematical Problems in Engineering

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Safety archetypes identification and behavior simulation for nuclear power plant operation human reliability improvement

Mao

et al. 2022

Annals of Nuclear Energy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A Study on Mobile Phone Interface Interaction Design for the Elderly Based on Digital Technology

Yuan

2024

Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear Sciences

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The rapid development of digital technology significantly impacts the use of cell phone interfaces by the elderly. This paper aims to analyze the interaction design of cell phone interfaces for the elderly to enhance their user experience and ease of use. This paper investigates the evaluation system for evaluating cell phone interface interaction for the elderly, including interface size, Layout, and functionality. A group of elderly people aged 65-75 are invited to evaluate the effects of different design options by observing their performance under different interface sizes (large size 6.0 inches, medium size 5.5 inches, small size 4.5 inches) and layouts (nine-cell grid and combination type). The evaluation metrics are task completion time, number of operation errors, and eye movement data. The 6.0-inch interface experienced an average task completion time of 6.97 seconds, a decrease of approximately 6 seconds and 1 second from the 4.5-inch and 5.5-inch interfaces, respectively. The large-size interface had an average error rate of 1.11 per task, significantly less than the average error rate in the 4.5-inch and 5.5-inch interfaces. The more extensive interface significantly decreased user gaze points and gaze time, indicating more efficient information acquisition. More extensive cell phone interfaces and combined layouts can significantly improve interaction efficiency and reduce operation errors for elderly users, enhancing user experience. The findings of this study offer practical guidance for designing cell phone interfaces for the elderly and aid in promoting cell phone interface design for the elderly.

show abstract

Optimal design methods for a digital human-computer interface based on human reliability in a nuclear power plant

Cited by 3 publications

References 13 publications

Human Reliability Evaluation Based on Objective and Subjective Comprehensive Method Used for Ergonomic Interface Design

Human Reliability Evaluation Based on Objective and Subjective Comprehensive Method Used for Ergonomic Interface Design

Safety archetypes identification and behavior simulation for nuclear power plant operation human reliability improvement

A Study on Mobile Phone Interface Interaction Design for the Elderly Based on Digital Technology

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About