2007
DOI: 10.3233/jae-2007-763
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal design of ultrasonic motor using evolution strategy and finite element method

Abstract: Until now, Ultrasonic Motor (USM) have been designed by using some simple analytic equations or the trial and error method. Therefore, existent design methods of the USM have the problems such as the inaccuracy and the inefficiency. For the solution of these problems, we propose the optimal design methodology of a USM by using the Evolution Strategy (ES) and the Finite Element Method (FEM). The L1B4 USM is designed optimally by using proposed optimal design methodology.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the intermittent type ultrasonic motor, the micro push of vibrator to rotor is determined by the motion trajectory of the contact point, and the vibration amplitude alone cannot determine the work that the vibrator does to rotor. Some of the previous works on the optimal design of piezoelectric actuators (Silva, 2000; Bouchilloux and Uchino, 2003; Silva, 2003; Fernandez and Perriard, 2006; Flueckiger et al , 2007; Rho et al , 2007) only take the vibration amplitude in one direction into consideration, while the vibration amplitude in another direction and the phase difference between two directions are not considered. In this paper, the work that vibrator does to rotor is calculated as objective function.…”
Section: Objective Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the intermittent type ultrasonic motor, the micro push of vibrator to rotor is determined by the motion trajectory of the contact point, and the vibration amplitude alone cannot determine the work that the vibrator does to rotor. Some of the previous works on the optimal design of piezoelectric actuators (Silva, 2000; Bouchilloux and Uchino, 2003; Silva, 2003; Fernandez and Perriard, 2006; Flueckiger et al , 2007; Rho et al , 2007) only take the vibration amplitude in one direction into consideration, while the vibration amplitude in another direction and the phase difference between two directions are not considered. In this paper, the work that vibrator does to rotor is calculated as objective function.…”
Section: Objective Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It enlarged the vibrating amplitudes of the vibrator and the motor efficiency was increased (Akira, 1987). Using the finite element method, an optimal design methodology for the ultrasonic piezoelectric motors was presented (Rho. 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the design of electrical machines, the major challenge of successful full-scale development is to address the competing objectives, such as improved performance, machine reliability, and reduced cost. Optimisation of electrical machine is a kind of multi-variable and multi-modal problem [1]- [8]. So an accurate, high fidelity model should be obtained by using the numerical finite element method (FEM), as well as multiphysical characteristic of electrical machine should be taken into account.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%