2018
DOI: 10.5705/ss.202015.0285
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal designs for regression models using the second-order least squares estimator

Abstract: We investigate properties and numerical algorithms for A-and D-optimal regression designs based on the second-order least squares estimator (SLSE). Several results are derived, including a characterization of the A-optimality criterion. We can formulate the optimal design problems under SLSE as semidefinite programming or convex optimization problems and we show that the resulting algorithms can be faster than more conventional multiplicative algorithms, especially in nonlinear models. Our results also indicat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The proof of Theorem 2 is in the Appendix. The results in Theorem 2 are consistent with the numerical results in Gao and Zhou (2017) and Yin and Zhou (2017). Notice that Gao and Zhou (2017) gave the results about the number of support points for D-optimal designs based on the moment theory, but Theorem 2 generalizes the results for both A-and D-optimal designs based on the equivalence results.…”
Section: Polynomial Modelssupporting
confidence: 80%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The proof of Theorem 2 is in the Appendix. The results in Theorem 2 are consistent with the numerical results in Gao and Zhou (2017) and Yin and Zhou (2017). Notice that Gao and Zhou (2017) gave the results about the number of support points for D-optimal designs based on the moment theory, but Theorem 2 generalizes the results for both A-and D-optimal designs based on the equivalence results.…”
Section: Polynomial Modelssupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Proof of Lemma 1: From the fact that C = CC and φ A (ξ, θ 0 ) = tr (C B −1 (ξ, θ 0 )) (Yin and Zhou, 2017), we have…”
Section: Appendix: Proofsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations