2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00373-020-02202-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal Domination Polynomials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, we rely on the analysis of the roots of a related polynomial and a Möbius transformation to show U n is more reliable than C n . See [12] for further details on Möbius transformations in general, [7,9] for use of Möbius transformations for roots of graph polynomials, and [2] for their use in finding UMR graphs with respect to other notions of reliability. Proof.…”
Section: Proofmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, we rely on the analysis of the roots of a related polynomial and a Möbius transformation to show U n is more reliable than C n . See [12] for further details on Möbius transformations in general, [7,9] for use of Möbius transformations for roots of graph polynomials, and [2] for their use in finding UMR graphs with respect to other notions of reliability. Proof.…”
Section: Proofmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let G be a graph where each node is operational independently with probability p and let t, s ∈ V(G) be target nodes. Then the two-terminal node reliability of G is the probability that the graph is connected and contains t and s. In a very recent paper [6], it was shown that for every n and m there exists a UMR graph with respect to two-terminal node reliability; however when the target nodes are required to have distance at least 3 from each other, there exists a UMR graph on n nodes and m edges if and only if m ≤ 8, m ≥ ⌊ (n−1) 2 4…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%