2016
DOI: 10.1177/0954406215612831
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Optimal dynamic design of planar mechanisms using teaching–learning-based optimization algorithm

Abstract: A two-stage optimization method for optimal dynamic design of planar mechanisms is presented in this paper. For dynamic balancing, minimization of the shaking force and the shaking moment is achieved by finding optimum mass distribution of mechanism links using the equimomental system of point-masses in the first stage of the optimization. In the second stage, their shapes are synthesized systematically by closed parametric curve, i.e. cubic B-spline curve corresponding to the optimum inertial parameters found… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, extensive research has been conducted on swarm intelligence algorithms in recent years. Inspired by the laws underlying the development of natural things, some examples of these algorithms are the teaching and learning optimization algorithm (TLBO) [1], the positive chord algorithm (SCA) [2,3], the particle swarm optimization (PSO) [4][5][6], and the genetic algorithm (GA) [7,8]. They can also be inspired by the collective or social intelligence of natural biology, as in the case of the Harris hawks algorithm (HHO) [9,10], the artificial fish swarm algorithm (FSA) [11], the sparrow search algorithm (CSA) [12][13][14], and the gray wolf optimization algorithm (GWO) [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, extensive research has been conducted on swarm intelligence algorithms in recent years. Inspired by the laws underlying the development of natural things, some examples of these algorithms are the teaching and learning optimization algorithm (TLBO) [1], the positive chord algorithm (SCA) [2,3], the particle swarm optimization (PSO) [4][5][6], and the genetic algorithm (GA) [7,8]. They can also be inspired by the collective or social intelligence of natural biology, as in the case of the Harris hawks algorithm (HHO) [9,10], the artificial fish swarm algorithm (FSA) [11], the sparrow search algorithm (CSA) [12][13][14], and the gray wolf optimization algorithm (GWO) [15].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Practical ways to move the CoM of the system and to make it stationary have been to add a set of counterweights [2][3][4][5], to add auxiliary structures [6][7][8][9], or to modify the form of the links from the early design phase [10][11][12]. A comprehensive review of the methods with illustrative examples can be seen in Reference [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…*One of the fundamental problems in the theory of mechanisms is the determination of the acceleration of individual members of the mechanism, as well as unknown forces in the joints, depending on the forces acting on the mechanism. To solve such problems, the general laws of body dynamics are generally applied (Beer and Johnston, 1997;Goldstein, 1991;Pytel and Kiusalaas, 1996;Chaudhary and Chaudhary, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%